So because a few people can afford 2080 ti's, 9900ks's and 4k 144hz screens you think PC online gaming isn't fair. I'd rather be playing on my own mediocre machine vs a player with top of the line equipment than be dragged down to 30 fps hell. If he wins it wasn't because of his equipment but because he was better than me. The only big issue with PC online gaming is the darn aimbots and wallhacks.
-
Competitor rules
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Why are GPUs so expensive?
- Thread starter Guest2
- Start date
So because a few people can afford 2080 ti's, 9900ks's and 4k 144hz screens you think PC online gaming isn't fair. I'd rather be playing on my own mediocre machine vs a player with top of the line equipment than be dragged down to 30 fps hell. If he wins it wasn't because of his equipment but because he was better than me. The only big issue with PC online gaming is the darn aimbots and wallhacks.
Eh, no, the problem with PC online gaming is the hackers. A crap player on a 60Hz monitor will still be a crap player on a 240Hz monitor.
TV screens have 200 Hz BMR, 400 Hz BMR, 800 Hz BMR, 1000 Hz BMR, 1600 Hz PMI.
You're totally wrong as am just as useless & crap at gaming on my 144hz & 120hz monitors as I was on my 60hz monitor
Those aren't refresh rates, you know that right?
Soldato
- Joined
- 22 Nov 2018
- Posts
- 2,715
They can be called "virtual" refresh rates and effectively have the same result for the viewer.
Oh, I just realised who I responded to. I forgot you don't understand how TV's work. In the context of the conversation about higher refresh rates giving a competitive advantage then no, the result isn't the same for the viewer. BMR, CMR, PMI, whatever name the company puts on it, are all motion interpolation technologies. If you want to be competitive in console gaming you will want to turn these off. I would go so far as to say that in any FPS shooter on a console, even single player, you should turn these technologies off.
Caporegime
I see you quoted him and thought "Why you do dis"?? LMAO
My old sony had 1000Hz refresh rate, so that translates to 1000 screens ps right?
There are no options to turn the effective refresh rate off ! lol
side note: you still can not get that nvidia gives far worse image quality, can you?
Soldato
Stop before you get schooled in yet another thread, 4k8kw10.
What? Those figures you quoted aren't real refresh rates. They are the quoted refresh rates of the motion smoothing technology in the TV. It's marketing to sell more TV's because big numbers fool people, just like they fooled you. Basically, since they are defined by the TV manufacturer they can be anything the manufacturer wants.
I believe the setting in a Panasonic TV is IFC, turn this off to disable motion smoothing. I also think that enabling game mode will turn it off as well.
And your question about Nvidia image quality is daft. Because you have shown so little knowledge or understanding of any topic or thread you have posted in I doubt you are right about image quality, and if you say Nvidia has worse image quality then the opposite is probably true.
The framerate on your gaming monitor is also not real. You have 0.1% lows and 1% lows, micro-stutters, etc.
TVs need it because the most common TV signal is 576p25, and they need something in order to improve the visual perception for the user!
What rubbish are you spouting about now? Seriously? We aren't talking about frame rates, we are talking about refresh rates.
Caporegime
Soldato
Are we expecting a good proper generational jump this time unlike the 2000 series from NV? So a 3070 should pretty much = a 2080Ti, and with next gen consoles launching some months later i guess that would be a good time for that kind of performance.
Associate
- Joined
- 1 Aug 2017
- Posts
- 686
Something will need to be done regarding the prices of GPUs when next gen consoles get released. I mean, the Series X GPU is apparently around 12TF, if true it just makes the overpricing in today's market even more laughable.
Plus with all the optimisations consoles have, i do think Nvidia/AMD will have a tougher time shifting mediocre 400/500 GBP cards.
Next year Nvidia/AMD need to start offering incredible cards at very good prices, it's the only way they'll stop the mass migration to consoles for some people.
Personally, consoles aren't an option for me, so i'm hoping they both get their **** together with regards to pricing.
Plus with all the optimisations consoles have, i do think Nvidia/AMD will have a tougher time shifting mediocre 400/500 GBP cards.
Next year Nvidia/AMD need to start offering incredible cards at very good prices, it's the only way they'll stop the mass migration to consoles for some people.
Personally, consoles aren't an option for me, so i'm hoping they both get their **** together with regards to pricing.
Last edited:
In fairness he is completely correct, Nvidia did intentionally lower the image quality of their drivers to get an FPS advantage over ATi. The bit he's missing out however is that it isn't 2006 anymore
go and have a lie down
In fairness he is completely correct, Nvidia did intentionally lower the image quality of their drivers to get an FPS advantage over ATi. The bit he's missing out however is that it isn't 2006 anymore
Things are much fresher, though
https://www.nvidia.com/en-us/geforc...ow-quality-image-after-switched-from-old-ati/
https://forums.tomshardware.com/threads/nvidia-geforce-1080ti-poor-graphics-quality.3293637/
What is "lie down"?