Soldato
- Joined
- 28 Nov 2004
- Posts
- 16,024
- Location
- 9th Inner Circle
I'm sorry, but are you on crack? Have you ever used an iMac to edit large TIFF files? Are you one of those that assume because they're standard in the design industry that they will always run better no matter what?
CS3 is Mac native, big whoop. As soon as you get a PC with decent spec the lines are blurred so much its a moot point. If i'de blindly gone out and brought an iMac for the sort of editing i do i'de be very very annoyed. I know this because i use the same Mac i could have brought (20" iMac - £800) at college everyday, and its just nowhere NEAR as fast.
Yes for non-techies who want to get stuff done they do make a lot of sense. I'm simply saying if her brother heard photos and immediately jumped 'Mac', it's not ALWAYS the best solution for her needs.
Photoshop & Illustrator both run fine on my MacBook and can edit large RAW files without problems. My only problem at the moment is I only have 1GB of RAM.
The Web Designer who used to work for me ran CS3 Master + Final Cut Studio and never had any problems with slow downs or lack of responsiveness. In fact he had Motion, Final Cut and Photoshop open editing some video for a production the school was doing for the BBC and it did not skip a beat. Good job seeing as there was a some what tight deadline!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c52ff/c52ff17eea75f5fa374792d68c3cb4c06c406d96" alt="Wink ;) ;)"
You could do all that with a PC, of course, but there is a reason (not just blind faith
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8852d/8852d2062d7110393ceea768b048b31c5d4853ef" alt="Stick Out Tongue :p :p"
Oh and I don't just make blind decisions as an IT Professional I make educated informed decisions and whilst a Mac isn't the answer to every users problems it is my professional opinion that for the average home user they make more sense than a PC.