Why don't UKIP learn ?

[FnG]magnolia;26776064 said:
And you're a borderline racist, attention-seeking neanderthal who can barely string two words together, let alone an entire and understandable sentence.

Allegedly.
Click to expand...

24yz8ed.gif
 
Father Ted said:
Is the Duke of Edinburgh a UKIP member by any chance?
Click to expand...

UKIP was actually formed by the Duke of Edinburgh and Jeremy Clarkson because the Tory party is just too left wing for them. They have to control it from behind the scenes though, which is why Nigel Farage fronts the operation. Fact.
 
Oh no not again. I really hope they don't manage to attract sufficient support at the General Election. I mean, it can't be constitutionally possible surely, you must have to be able to prove you can actually govern properly before the Queen gives her ceremonial OK to it. Can't she have a veto tucked away somewhere for just such an occasion :)

Having said that, they are somewhat useful at a local government level to uproot a very comfortable (and below par) Labour-run council in my area.
 
Last edited:
Good old BBC, I expect they will not be airing LITTLE BRITAIN anymore then. Surely that must have offended, the easily offended, as much as Janice Atkinson has , seeming as LB is aired all over the world.
Oh but of course they wont, Janice Atkinson is a UKIP racist and a BBC programme cannot ever be racist can it.
 
FunkyCowie said:
In fact because of how Taiwan and the UK does things my wife has Dual Nationality and legally holds a British and Taiwanese passort
Click to expand...

Unrelated, but I may have to pick your brain about this one day, as this whole thing is melting my head. I thought getting a HK marriage recognised in Taiwan was tricky enough, but that was mostly her sorting it out - this time I'm responsible for it! :p
 
I don't understand the outrage. I rarely understand why people get whipped up over words. Is ting tong even a thing? At least the "n word" has some historical basis for offence. But ting tong?!
 
Adsta said:
Edit: just read it fully, I'm not quite sure Mrs Munday fully understands nationality though.. ""I'm from Thailand. I'm married to an Englishman and now I'm British." Well ok.... but your still Thai, I mean you were still born in Thailand with Thai parent. Does that also mean that the Englishman she married is now also Thai by some magical power ?
Click to expand...

I'm not sure you understand nationality - she can be British for the reasons she's given. Her ethnicity is Thai... her nationality can change.
 
panthro said:
I'd like to know the rationale behind why a Thai immigrant would vote for UKIP (how stupid do you have to be?).
Click to expand...

Not necessarily a contradiction there... granted her husband is presumably a UKIP supporting chav and she's gone along with it. UKIP aren't anti all immigrants(though some of their members might be), they're anti-EU and anti the uncontrolled EU immigration associated with it. She isn't some Eastern European who's been given some right to be here simply because she's an EU citizen, she's the spouse of a British person who's had to jump through the usual hoops re: visas etc... I'm not aware that UKIP is anti spouse visas etc... they're anti the idea that anyone from any number of EU countries has a right to be here and its completely unchecked.
 
I think this is excellent. All MPs should be made to blurt out the first thing they think of on all occasions.
The only other occasion similar to this that I can think of was Gordon Brown a while ago. Just to point out UKIP doesn't have the monopoly, they are just perhaps less guarded due to inexperience!

The problem is that we don't often get to see their true contempt for the electorate.
 
Redz said:
We'll see that more often after May next year when a UKIP/Conservative coalition has been formed. ;)
Click to expand...

More chance of a labour-conservative coalition.

For starters, the last thing the conservative want to do is damage their fragile reputation by being associated with a group of racist single-policy misogynistic homophobes to get perhaps 1 seat, at the most 2 seats (and the latter is extremely unlikely)? Much more useful to have a coalition with the libdems even if they poll miserable they will have 10-30times more seats than the UKIP, even the greens would be more beneficial most likely.

The ironic thing for UKIP voters is that by voting for UKIP they simply increase the chance that Labour will get in to power.
 
D.P. said:
More chance of a labour-conservative coalition.

For starters, the last thing the conservative want to do is damage their fragile reputation by being associated with a group of racist single-policy misogynistic homophobes to get perhaps 1 seat, at the most 2 seats (and the latter is extremely unlikely)? Much more useful to have a coalition with the libdems even if they poll miserable they will have 10-30times more seats than the UKIP, even the greens would be more beneficial most likely.

The ironic thing for UKIP voters is that by voting for UKIP they simply increase the chance that Labour will get in to power.
Click to expand...

A lot of the UKIP votes are coming from the Labour Party in the north of england so saying "It'll let labour in" Isn't necessarily true.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom