Why have graphics stagnated for almost 20 years?

MissChief

MissChief

MissChief

Caporegime
Joined
17 Jul 2010
Posts
25,716
since 2004 is demonstrably wrong. I would say though, Ray tracing has really been the only real leap in graphics since probably 2015. Take Division 1, now 7 years old. it still looks amazing and even if it were released today people would still be wowed by the weather effects and lighting, even if it doesn't have RT. Unreal Engine 5 will help push things along no doubt but it feels all a bit stagnant recently.
 

Rroff

Rroff

Rroff

Man of Honour
Joined
13 Oct 2006
Posts
91,053
MissChief said:
since 2004 is demonstrably wrong. I would say though, Ray tracing has really been the only real leap in graphics since probably 2015. Take Division 1, now 7 years old. it still looks amazing and even if it were released today people would still be wowed by the weather effects and lighting, even if it doesn't have RT. Unreal Engine 5 will help push things along no doubt but it feels all a bit stagnant recently.
Click to expand...

Wish they'd remaster The Division 1 - with proper physics particles and fluid dynamics, etc. the weather systems and so on would look crazy good - something is just a little off with the snow and the smoke/steam breaks the illusion when it doesn't interact properly with the scene. Throw in ray tracing and while they are at it overhaul the game mechanics and make fuller use of all the street space and underground areas, fix the silly movement changes they made later in the game life and I'd buy it all over again.

Overall I think TD1 is one of the games which impresses me the most out of anything graphically in years - although there are some attention to detail issues like objects floating when they are supposed to be mounted on a wall, etc. what really elevates that game graphically is the little attentions to detail visually.

In some respects I don't entirely disagree with the OP as some of the older engines if you really push the boat out and aren't limited by the design considerations due to the hardware limits at the time can produce graphics not far off some of the latest and greatest engines - but certain advances like with real time indirect lighting and ambient occlusion and so on are hard to match.
 
Last edited:

Paul_cz

Paul_cz

Paul_cz

Soldato
Joined
1 Feb 2009
Posts
3,105
If OP said 15 years he would have at least a little bit a point because that is when Crysis came out, and Crysis was about 5 years ahead of its time and still looks pretty good today.

But even compared to Crysis, many games look vastly better today.

desktopscreenshot2022ocjnc.png


1091500_2022021720433iqkdh.png


1091500_2022021720360mikna.png


assassinscreedvalhallszkrr.png


28608319790_08481c95bftjep.jpg


637650_20210810223937h9jfx.png


farcry6screenshot2021azj4z.png


farcryprimalscreensho40jyt.png
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom