[Point 2]Security
Well, this is a contentious one. But a simple one for me. Overall, Firefox is fairly secure and robust. Is it better than competitors? I don't know. Then again, I think the whole security deal is overrated.
Only the masses use Chrome. Techies use FF and that is the gospel truth.
What a load of crap, I started with Netscape then moved to Firefox version 3 (yes 3, decade ago), then over to Opera before it went Chromium based, then to FF until Quantum version came out (which had add on issues) . I went to Vivaldi which has lots of customisation that techies love. For me it's all about stability and customisation which Vivaldi has.
I only say that due to things like ESNI as an example. When new standards need to be tested or even adopted it's usually companies like Mozilla collaborating with the likes of Cloudflare to get things rolling. There are certain companies in the industry that work in a open source way and cloudflare are one of them so it makes them cool by proxy. (This is the techy in me speaking)
So yea, it's not really a load of crap because you wouldn't find Cloudflare working with Google to do this as they dont share the same values around privacy, freedom and being open source.
Anyway forget the main article read the Mozilla statement when Microsoft announced Edge was going Chrome based.
It's not healthy for the state of the internet.
One reason why I left Firefox was it is not as stable as Vivaldi and a lot of third party add-ons would not work with FF Quantum build , Vivaldi was developed by the original developers of Opera before Opera went Chromium based, there are plenty of browser alternatives out there for you to choose from, personally if you are worried about data tracking etc don't use Windows, don't leave your house (tracking satellites, phones etc, and wear a tin foil hat). There are plenty of ways they track you regardless of you using your PC or browser, so the statement does not mean much, paranoid ring a bell?
Personally I won't be moving away from Vivaldi, its rock stable, fantastic customisation and everything I need, bye-bye Firefox RIP.
Thanks for mentioning Vivaldi, I've not tried it before or even heard of it for that matter. So far, it seems very well organised and laid out. Liking it a lot.
The issue is that the internet is being shaped by chrome due to it's high usage. This in turn makes other browser developers adopted chromium for they're underling browser engine and thus websites are only being created with Chrome in mind.
This also puts Google in the drivers seat when it comes to the direction the internet will go with regards to technology, freedom, privacy etc...
If you want to support a free and open internet then you really need to start using a browser that supports those values. And Chrome and it's derivates just ain't that browser.
Why move from Microsoft's own EdgeHTML rendering subsystem? Freidman described it as wanting to be free from the "chase state." The team was chasing compatibility issues that popped up because most websites target Chrome. With the move to Chromium, the development team could stop chasing and start contributing new web capabilities. That possibility lifted the team's spirits, Freidman said. Since making the move, the team has had over 400 of its contributions, or pull requests, accepted into Chromium.
Another reason for the move, according to Friedman, was the ability to build a browser cross-platform, meaning not just for Windows, but for iOS, Android, and even Apple Macs. Web developers who use Macs were a specific driver for this: With Edge on the Mac, those developers wouldn't need to switch boxes to see how their sites rendered on the Windows default browser
I think this thread needs some balance. People are inferring Microsoft gave up and bowed out but that is not the case. Microsoft still contribute, only now they contribute chromium instead of fighting a loosing battle, trying to maintain compatibility with an Internet that's largely built for chrome anyway.
https://www.pcmag.com/news/368180/microsoft-edge-on-chromium-what-does-it-mean
I don't see the issue to be honest. MS are far from out of the game.
But your article says exactly what I'm saying:
"But the idea of the non-vendor-specific, interoperable, standards-bases web seems to have died with the move; Firefox is now the last holdout among independent browser engines"
If you care about freedom, privacy and choice then stop using any chromium based browsers.
Only you can effect change!
I dont care about that. Chromium is open source and contributed to by MS, now. The only thing that's changed is Edge got better. MS can concentrate on helping to push web forward instead of trying to play catchup. Win-win as far as I'm concerned