Soldato
- Joined
- 15 Oct 2003
- Posts
- 15,865
- Location
- Chengdu
List of Brave browser CONTROVERSIES - RedditWay back in 2016, Brave promised to remove banner ads from websites and replace them with their own, basically trying to extract money directly from websites without the consent of their owners
In the same year, CEO Brendan Eich unilaterally added a fringe, pay-to-win Wikipedia clone into the default search engine list.
In 2018, Tom Scott and other creators noticed Brave was soliciting donations in their names without their knowledge or consent.
In 2020, Brave got caught injecting URLs with affiliate codes when users tried browsing to various websites.
Also in 2020, they silently started injecting ads into their home page backgrounds, pocketing the revenue. There was a lot of pushback: "the sponsored backgrounds give a bad first impression."
In 2021, Brave's TOR window was found leaking DNS queries, and a patch was only widely deployed after articles called them out. (h/t schklom for pointing this out!)
In 2022, Brave floated the idea of further discouraging users from disabling sponsored messages.
In 2023, Brave got caught installing a paid VPN service on users' computers without their consent.
Also in 2023, Brave got caught scraping and reselling people's data with their custom web crawler, which was designed specifically not to announce itself to website owners.
In 2024, Brave gave up on providing advanced fingerprint protection, citing flawed statistics (people who would enable the protection would likely disable Brave telemetry).
In 2025, Brave staff publish an article endorsing PrivacyTests and say they "work with legitimate testing sites" like them. This article fails to disclose PrivacyTests is run by a Brave Senior Architect.
Other notes
They partnered with NewEgg to ship ads in boxes.
Brave purchased and then, in 2017, terminated the alternative browser Link Bubble.
In 2019, Brave taunted Firefox users who visited their homepage.
In 2025, Brave taunted people searching for Firefox on the Google Play Store. (The VP denied this occurred, but also demonstrated ignorance of multiple different screenshots.)
Have you saved any passwords in Firefox?v136 has annoyed me slightly. Each time I launch Firefox, I am taken to my homepage which is google.co.uk. I don't care to use Firefox Home and I've done this for as long as I can remember - Google is a simple homepage, even if it is probably seen as old school these days.
Ever since v136 installed today, when I launch Firefox I am asked for my master password for Firefox. I can only think this is because I'm not signed into Google, again another one of my stubborn choices I wish to maintain - for all Google probably tracks us all anyway, I'd rather not link my data to a Google account where possible.
Yes and I use a master password to help keep them secure. I suppose I can just hit escape for each dialogue, but it's not something I've ever had to do before.Have you saved any passwords in Firefox?
You could always use a password manager like Bitwarden (free or £10 a year) and then you could easily use your passwords on multiple devices at once. The Firefox extension is pretty nice. In terms of stopping the prompt I'm not sure.Yes and I use a master password to help keep them secure. I suppose I can just hit escape for each dialogue, but it's not something I've ever had to do before.
I think I'll give Brave a wide berth.List of Brave browser CONTROVERSIES - Reddit
What worries me is people blowing things out of proportion, possibly leading to the demise of Firefox. I hope not.![]()
Cloudflare's bot bouncer blocks weirdo browsers
Not on Firefox or a Chrome derivative? You shall not pass
Users of some of the less well-known web browsers are getting blocked from accessing multiple sites by Cloudflare's flaky browser-detection routines.
Aside from reporting it on Cloudflare's forum, there appears to be little users can do, and the company doesn't seem to be paying attention.
The part i don't get with the umbrage taken with these new privacy polices is that this data has been getting collected by Mozilla for ages it's simply that they didn't (afaik) have a policy to say what they collected and how they used it, now they've put one in place and that's what seems to have ticked people off.Worth the watch for those grinding an axe all of a sudden.