Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Nvidia adding fake frames in because they know they won't be able to keep up with the raw power of the 7900XTcouldn't make it up. They might as well just make there own fps counting software that reports double the frame rate
That image shows the order in which the frames are displayed, not the order in which they are calculated by the GPU.This doesn't follow.
Without frame generation, frame rate is 50Hz, a frame every 20ms and input polled every 20ms.
With frame generation, frame rate is 100Hz, a frame every 10ms and input polled every 20ms.
The latency remains the same.
Have a look at Nvidia's diagram:
The generated frame comes after the rendered one, not before it.
I think this probably depends on how it is integrated with the game engine. If the engine has full control and access to what is happening with these generated frames then it can use the headroom allowed by half the frames being generated to run a physics update on every rendered frame, doubling the number of times it polls input each second. Obviously you won't see this on screen immediately, but you would get the faster response.
Exactly - I just read the blog on FRUC (as they're calling it) - they give a very clear example of generating a frame between two other frames:
nvidia said:
www.digitaltrends.com
That's how you do it AMD, sorry I forgot, FSR is free.....
Hoping DF will get their videos out soon to see if there are any other improvements to dlss aside from frame generation and reflex.
I think lower latency will still feel better regardless of FPS but overall I don't think DLSS 3 looks that appealing so far. When I ran SLI back in the day my main beef was the extra frame of latency due to AFR meaning I really needed a decent frame rate without SLI for the input latency to feel okay in SLI. I hope that DLSS frame insertion isn't gonna be the same deal...Anyone checked out this?
From this link https://wccftech.com/nvidia-geforce...k-2077-dlss-3-cuts-gpu-wattage-by-25-percent/
It doesn't look good, the bigger swings in minimum FPS and 1% lows compared to native, but then again the native at 1440p even though the setting are all ultra and pyscho doesn't look good for the power of the GPU?!
And still the latency hasn't been hugely increased, 170FPS average at over 50ms would still feel really sluggish, maybe worse than 60FPS at 70ms?
Interesting - so, for reference I just tested out CP at Ultra RT/Psycho @1440 on the 3090Ti and I get an average of 38-ish fps wandering around the market at night (one of the heaviest locations) - that seems to tally up with the 4090 being around 1.5 times faster (excluding DLSS).Anyone checked out this?
From this link https://wccftech.com/nvidia-geforce...k-2077-dlss-3-cuts-gpu-wattage-by-25-percent/
It doesn't look good, the bigger swings in minimum FPS and 1% lows compared to native, but then again the native at 1440p even though the setting are all ultra and pyscho doesn't look good for the power of the GPU?!
And still the latency hasn't been hugely increased, 170FPS average at over 50ms would still feel really sluggish, maybe worse than 60FPS at 70ms?
How come power draw is lower with DLSS 3, is it because the GPU is doing less work? Edit: I just read the article, the tensor cores are more efficient at this and offload work from the rest of the GPU (I am not sure whether this is speculation on their part).Anyone checked out this?
From this link https://wccftech.com/nvidia-geforce...k-2077-dlss-3-cuts-gpu-wattage-by-25-percent/
It doesn't look good, the bigger swings in minimum FPS and 1% lows compared to native, but then again the native at 1440p even though the setting are all ultra and pyscho doesn't look good for the power of the GPU?!
And still the latency hasn't been hugely increased, 170FPS average at over 50ms would still feel really sluggish, maybe worse than 60FPS at 70ms?
