Do some gsync monitors have 3d? Yes
Do all monitors have 3D? No
Is 3D therefore a feature that can be supported by the gsync module? Yes
Could, in theory, the gsync module support other features as well as 3d, ulmb, gsync and 1440@144hz that would then be available on gsync monitor that would be missing on some other monitors? Yes
is melmac therefore wrong in suggesting that they couldnt add any new features to the gsync module? Of course, how stupid do you think i am.
I also pointed out that the only "3D Ready" monitors on sale are 3DVision... youve linked to a 3DVision monitor, so all youve done is agree with me.
Threepwood pointed out that you can cobble together a 3D solution using products from 5 seperate vendors that are not on each others supported list, but that is tangential to my actual point.
People are saying that freesync will kill off gsync because it is cheaper. AMD did a similar campaign with 3D with Samsung and LG... yeah that totally killed off 3DVision
You keep building that strawman and i'll keep knocking him back down.
Wow, How stupid do I think you are? Too stupid for words. Really. You are still going about 3d and ULMB saying they are features of Gsync, they aren't. And if you can't get that, then yes, you are stupid.
But, here, since you have trouble understanding, I will layout this conversation for you. I won't quote the whole thing, just a brief layout.
Bru: Suggested things that could be in the next version of Gsync.
Me: (my first post) Told him why his ideas might not work.
You: Come in and state that 3D and ULMB were features of Gsync.
Me: Nope, 3D and ULMB are already out there in other monitors. They aren't a feature of Gsync.
The conversation started by discussing things that might be in Gsync 2.0. There is no mention of AMD 3D or Freesync so far. It's not a conversation about that. It's purely talking about Gsync.
You next post is when you go off on your tangent about AMD and Freesync, saying that until Freesync monitors are released with 3D and ULMB then they are features of Gsync and not freesync.Hold on? What? Why are you bringing AMD or Freesync into this conversation? What has either of things got to do with Features that are in Gsync or might be in Gsync 2?
Of course I linked to 3D monitor, to show you that there are monitors out there with 3D don't have Gsync. I mentioned a Ben Q monitor as well, as one that has ULMB that hasn't Gsync. Why do you keep bringing up AMD 3D? I mentioned the SA700D to show you that even non Nvidia monitors could do 3D Vision, so they definitely wouldn't have Gsync. But you think I brought up as an argument against Gsync for Freesync. LOL.
Here is a few questions
Are there monitors out there with 3D that don't have Gsync? Yes, you keep waffling on about them. All those 3D vision ones.
Are there monitors out there with ULMB? Yes,
Do you need Gsync for either of these? Nope, you don't. In fact you have to turn off Gsync for them to work.
So can either of these be called a feature of Gsync? No.
They are features of the Rog Swift, and the BenQ and other monitors. Just like Gsync is a feature of Rog Swift. But no way in hell could you call 3D and ULMB features of Gsync.
So you keep knocking my Strawman arguments out of the park? Andy you aren't even in the right playing field.
Oh, the cost and sales chances of Freesync was another discussion we were having. Which I still think you are been too negative about Freesync chances. This other discussion had nothing to do with Features Gsync might have in the future.
You also seem to have some misguided idea that I am against Gsync, I am not against it in anyway and I have never said a bad word about it. In fact if I had a Nvidia card I would have already purchased a Gsync monitor. But I sold my 680 in the middle of summer to help pay for an Xbox one.