Tommy B said:What other people say regarding this topic is crap.
We all have different hearing and some of us have more responsive ears. As mentioned above, I can tell the difference between compressed files and lossless files quite easily, but my best mate thinks I'm barking. For me, the treble is more defined and the bass is much deeper. Also, lossless files do not distort even with the volume on ear-drum damaging levels.
Well I've given it a try. I just encoded 2 different tracks to MP3 using the LAME codec. One at 128kbps and one at 320kbps. I encoded some Sibellius and some Muse. I couldn't tell the difference on my Technics HiFi, or on my iRiver mp3 player with Sony headphones.
I know it's hardly the pinnacle of studio equipment, but for me, 128kbps will do nicely. Still, I encode most at 160kbps.
This was the thread that I remember:
http://forums.overclockers.co.uk/showthread.php?t=17565580