Chipset drivers might be a start.
As we've even covered in this thread, you can use whichever you like irrespective of what you've bought.
Yes. Half a page before you posted, at #78.So if i buy 64bit OEM vista i can install and use 32bit version? Sorry missed that bit but thanks for the info if thats correct. Excuse if this is side tracking the thread.
To clear up the iTunes issue, iTunes works fine on Vista x64, the CD burning driver doesn't however. This can be downloaded separately from here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Itunes#_note-28
However, synching the iPhone and iPod touch will not work because these new iPods use HFS+ as the file system, and Apple install a driver onto Vista x86 to allow iTunes to read them. I have no idea how they managed to get the driver signed without also making an x64 version.
Where can i find the 64bit sidebar ?Vista 32 on my intel would let me see 3710 MB of this according to the sidebar widget, I went 64bit on this one, only because I had a licence. I do not think the 64 bit version was any slower than 32 bit, but having the extra RAM (6GB in main rig) lets me have a lot more apps running at the same time - multiple firefox (3 separate ones each with say 20 tabs open, eats up the ram (like IE7 or any browser) and the beast still flies.
Peeps who come round and are running 32 bit XP can't believe how much my rig can do at the same time.
I am happy with 64 bit and didn't notice any difference to 32 bit vista, the biggest change/shock was actually going from XP to Vista as I had to self learns the 'design features' within vista, oh and the extra disc space needed.
I'm with Acidhell2 here in that I know that my OS won't need any major updates, and I upgrade 32 bit apps to 64 bit when they are released. Office 2007 etc. The only issue I had is that vista x64 runs the 32 bit sidebar version by default. Once I upped this to the 64 bit, widgets like the msn one now work properly.
Personally I don't think about whether the OS is 64 bit or 32 bit, everything I have thrown at it works, including itunes.
HTH
So if i buy 64bit OEM vista i can install and use 32bit version? Sorry missed that bit but thanks for the info if thats correct. Excuse if this is side tracking the thread.
In a nutshell the man at Microsoft said that the OEM OS packages are for their registered system builders only, and not for resale onto a private system builder as he described me.
Can someone shed some light on this?
thanks for the quick reply.
What is annoying is the nice man from MS only told me this after he took my name, address, telephone number and email address. Lets see if anything arrives from them....
Anway I've read again the link you posted - http://support.microsoft.com/kb/326246
especially the OEM section which does say to replace your media you need to contact the OEM for replacement, whose details will be on the COA and only to contact MS if the OEM is no longer in business.
Whilst it looks like I would be licensed to use my 32bit key on a 64bit version of Vista, obtaining a disc might not be so easy.
Running the same benchmark 2 times on an identical system can give that small of a difference. The only reason there is even a 32 bit vista is because of semprons/p4s/athlon xps/other old processors, the next version of windows will be 64 bit only.
That isn't actually true, Windows 7 has so far been divulged to be released in 32bit and 64bit versions. So much for Microsoft pushing for progress. I'd switch to x64 if i wasn't bound to a 32bit Mobile Core Duo
though from how Windows 7 so far has been represented, it would seem Windows 7 might not quite be the resource hog Vista is.
No.Isn't resource hog a negative play on higher requirements?
It might be more efficient, but it demands quite a shift in technology to run properly. My 2 year old laptop with 2Gb RAM doesn't run it too well, and my 4 year old laptop with 512Mb RAM doesn't even pass ACPI when you try and install it, and predictably, when you manage to get it on via other means, it's unusable.