Caporegime
- Joined
- 9 Mar 2006
- Posts
- 57,995
- Location
- Surrey
Do you have a source for Tel rejecting us for Spurs as you're claiming?
Last edited:
Winter Transfer window 24/25
- Thread starter Bigpig
- Start date
Talk about missing the point.
As per my last sentence, I strongly suspect he didn't reject you and has simply been faced with a choice of Spurs or staying at Bayern. Which by all accounts was the exact same situation with Yoro in the summer however that didn't stop you attempting to claim that the Yoro signing showed Utd's pull with top youngsters.
Caporegime
- Joined
- 9 Mar 2006
- Posts
- 57,995
- Location
- Surrey
Oh right, you're making things up ok. I thought you were trying to make a valid point.
And no I didn't say that at all. Woppy said we couldn't pull top youngsters and I said we did in the summer. I didn't say anything about him choosing us over Real as you seem to be claiming. I said he wanted to move to us and if he wanted to only move to Real he could have rejected us and waited for Lille to get desperate or moved for a free next season.
You literally replied to woppys post about players not wanting to join Utd with:
If that's not using the Yoro signing to prove Utd's pull then we're speaking different languages.
Caporegime
- Joined
- 9 Mar 2006
- Posts
- 57,995
- Location
- Surrey
That's literally what I wrote in my post Baz. Did you get lost in the three lines? Here I'll quote it
Which bit is confusing you?
Caporegime
- Joined
- 9 Mar 2006
- Posts
- 57,995
- Location
- Surrey
He's great on FM that's all I know about him. Another former La Masia graduate. Wouldn't be shocked if he turns out to be a great Rodri replacement.
Jeez, as I said earlier talk about missing the point.
Beyond just digging now, I'm really not sure what you're finding difficult. Yesterday, when it suits you, you're using an example of a player that only has one option (because nobody else would offer what Utd did) joining Utd as it showing how the best want to join you and 24 hours later when Spurs sign a player under the same circumstances your first reply is 'Spurs must have paid a hefty fee'.
To be clear if it wasn't already, I'm highlighting the shameless hypocrisy of your posting.
Caporegime
- Joined
- 9 Mar 2006
- Posts
- 57,995
- Location
- Surrey
'only has one option'
Or he could have rejected and stayed at Lille either for a year or until Lille buckled and accepted Real's offer instead of losing him on a free. But sure "one option" Hey remember when Tel accepted Spurs transfer move because he only had one option? No, me neither.
Now you've reached the point where you start throwing out personal insults, claiming you aren't and that you're misunderstood and then you'll start deleting posts again.
Or he could have rejected and stayed at Lille either for a year or until Lille buckled and accepted Real's offer instead of losing him on a free. But sure "one option" Hey remember when Tel accepted Spurs transfer move because he only had one option? No, me neither.
Now you've reached the point where you start throwing out personal insults, claiming you aren't and that you're misunderstood and then you'll start deleting posts again.
The thing is, sometimes with transfers there's a conflict of interest of the clubs and the player. Yoro is a good example because I believe he initially wanted to go to Real Madrid, but they were willing to wait until his contract expired which meant Lille wouldn't prosper as much financially versus someone buying him last summer.
I have no idea what's happening with the Tel situation as the Spurs transfer doesn't seem to align with what has previously been said. For example, Bayern wanted an obligation to buy clause apparently but whilst the structure of the Tel to Spurs deal hasn't been made public, it's understood it doesn't include a buy obligation.
I have no idea what's happening with the Tel situation as the Spurs transfer doesn't seem to align with what has previously been said. For example, Bayern wanted an obligation to buy clause apparently but whilst the structure of the Tel to Spurs deal hasn't been made public, it's understood it doesn't include a buy obligation.
Caporegime
- Joined
- 9 Mar 2006
- Posts
- 57,995
- Location
- Surrey
Because they must have offered something else, it's the only option. As much as Baz likes to claim, Bayern aren't going to reject an identical offer from United but accept it from Spurs.
I've not made any personal insults but it's no surprise you're going to go down this deflection route like you always do. At least this time you hadn't just insulted two members a few posts earlier like last time. And I never claimed I was misunderstood before and only deleted your moaning off topic post. All my posts, including the one you got upset about are still there
And in reply to your next post, I've made no reference to Bayern rejecting an identical offer from Utd. My very point is I believe that Spurs most likely have offered more than others and that's the same as what happened in the summer with Yoro. Your way of explaining the two deals is of course very different and you have to accept that people will call you out on it.
Caporegime
- Joined
- 9 Mar 2006
- Posts
- 57,995
- Location
- Surrey
Again you ignored my posts. I guess if you can call me a hypocrite I can call you a troll then? Or would you then start deleting posts?I've not made any personal insults but it's no surprise you're going to go down this deflection route like you always do. At least this time you hadn't just insulted two members a few posts earlier like last time. And I never claimed I was misunderstood before and only deleted your moaning off topic post. All my posts, including the one you got upset about are still there
And in reply to your next post, I've made no reference to Bayern rejecting an identical offer from Utd. My very point is I believe that Spurs most likely have offered more than others and that's the same as what happened in the summer with Yoro. Your way of explaining the two deals is of course very different and you have to accept that people will call you out on it.
Spurs offered 60m, Bayern accepted, he rejected them. How does that support your argument then Baz? Surely he had only one option!
No, you can't call people trolls. If you think I've been hypocritical then knock yourself out if you can back it up.
And no, what his options were yesterday are not the same as today Shami but you're still (probably intentionally as a deflection) missing the point. 24 hours ago you're using a near identical transfer scenario to prove Utd's pull and today when rolls are reversed you reply 'Spurs must have paid a hefty fee'. Talk about having your cake and eating it.
But anyway, I'm sure you won't agree with my interpretation and we'll go round in circles so it can be left there.
Caporegime
- Joined
- 9 Mar 2006
- Posts
- 57,995
- Location
- Surrey
Lol you calling me a hypocrite and then trying to do backflips to explain how Yoro had "only one option"! But Tel didn't is absolutely hilarious Baz 
Caporegime
- Joined
- 9 Mar 2006
- Posts
- 57,995
- Location
- Surrey
But he rejected the permanent move? That sounds like two options Baz.I said both only had one option Shami
1. Accept offer, move to Spurs
2. Reject offer, don't move to Spurs.
How many options is that Baz?
Last edited:
Apologies for not spelling it out for you, the only option of a move was to Spurs. Just like the only option of a move for Yoro was to Utd.
Caporegime
- Joined
- 9 Mar 2006
- Posts
- 57,995
- Location
- Surrey
So what happened if he rejected Spurs and stayed at Bayern? Was that not an option?
Yes, just like it was an option for Yoro. See how the situations were the same.