Wokery

[Dis86]

A multiracial western society isn’t a problem but a multicultural one can be if the rate of immigration is too fast to assimilate people to western ways.

Bingo.

 

[omnomnom]

No, they're not. But they're OK with them which is what you were questioning them about.

Infact, I'll give an addendum. I bet the most hated group of people in this country are white.

Travellers.

Are they ok with Aussies? They specifically put Brits.

 

[omnomnom]

Do you consider this report to be racist



https://www.theafricareport.com/106...l-be-less-white-and-increasingly-african/amp/

Erm I mean ive skimmed it to be honest but this just seems to be a factual piece. I dont really see an opinion here. If it was someone saying how good it is etc then Ai I would call it out as racist yea.

 

[arknor]

A multiracial western society isn’t a problem but a multicultural one can be if the rate of immigration is too fast to assimilate people to western ways.

it takes decades or a few generations until people really integrate into society since originally when they arrive they all flock to the same areas, usually it's only their kids who start to actually integrate and that depends how strictly religious the parents are etc

even the asians are probably against their offspring marrying a white person so might try to limit how much they can socialise with outsiders

 

[dlockers]

A multiracial western society isn’t a problem but a multicultural one can be if the rate of immigration is too fast to assimilate people to western ways.

Bingo.

And when the structures put in place by the majority natives (read: white) mean all of these folk are dumped together in cheap social housing, then can't one argue a systematic form of racism? Or does Brixton not exist?

 

[Dis86]

And when the structures put in place by the majority natives (read: white) mean all of these folk are dumped together in cheap social housing, then can't one argue a systematic form of racism? Or does Brixton not exist?

You mean when they're given a roof over their heads in the country that they've not contributed to? In the same way that those houses are also given to poor white individuals?

 

[dlockers]

You mean when they're given a roof over their heads in the country that they've not contributed to? In the same way that those houses are also given to poor white individuals?

So you agree that systematic racism has some truth? Also pretty sure Windrush were brought over to help the UK recover from the affects of WW2. So they were essentially indentured labour.

 

[StriderX]

Those people may not have contributed yet, but the country hasn't spent 16-18 years (or much longer) of welfare on them either.

 

[omnomnom]

Correct. But what's being portrayed is that everyone who objects to immigration is only doing it because of the skin colour of the immigrants.

Is this referring to our discussion because if so thats not what I was getting at all but the graffiti fella clearly was.

I agree with you that something needs to happen in regards to immigration but for everyone.

 

[Dis86]

So you agree that systematic racism has some truth? Also pretty sure Windrush were brought over to help the UK recover from the affects of WW2. So they were essentially indentured labour.

You didn't answer my questions.

 

[thenewoc]

Those people may not have contributed yet, but the country hasn't spent 16-18 years (or much longer) of welfare on them either.

It will do when they breed the next generation.

 

[BallistixOnZ490]

Correct. But what's being portrayed is that everyone who objects to immigration is only doing it because of the skin colour of the immigrants.

What about every single woman that refuses to date non white people on dating sites and social media?

This is also highly prevalent among all LGBT groups as well.

Is this 'just a preference' as all the wokeys defend it as? Nothing at all racist about saying 'Sorry, not into asians' on your dating profile?

When people don't even want to meet or simply socialize with non white people, why even bother still letting us in? You would actually be doing us a favour by stopping immigration and maybe even by sending me back, I'm sure every leftist that reads my online posts would love for that to happen.

 

[thenewoc]

What about every single woman that refuses to date non white people on dating sites and social media?

This is also highly prevalent among all LGBT groups as well.

Is this 'just a preference' as all the wokeys defend it at? Nothing at all racist about saying 'Sorry, not into asians' on your dating profile?

When people don't even want to meet or simply socialize with non white people, why even bother still letting us in? You would actually be doing us a favour by stopping immigration and maybe even by sending me back, I'm sure every leftist that reads my online posts would love for that to happen.

Its not really about individuals though it's about not having uncontrolled volumes, especially if they're from non English speaking countries since they're at an immediate disadvantage to become useful rather than spending a lifetime on benefits.

 

[Caracus2k]

So they were essentially indentured labour.

Indentured laboures are generally people who agree to work for someone for a period of time to pay of some debt.

Typically the debt is normally accrued as a result of the passage itself to ( and less frequently from) the place where the work is to take place.

I don't believe that this form of contract was generally employed when it came to the 'Windrush'.

People paying their own way to enter countries to look for or take up offers for (even low) paid work are not indentured as this refers to a specific arrangement as above.

The British troopship HMT Empire Windrush anchored at Tilbury Docks, Essex, on 21 June 1948 carrying hundreds of passengers from the Caribbean hoping for a new life in Britain

Many of them had paid £28 (about £1,000 today) to travel to Britain in response to job adverts in local newspapers.

 

[BallistixOnZ490]

Its not really about individuals though it's about not having uncontrolled volumes, especially if they're from non English speaking countries since they're at an immediate disadvantage to become useful rather than spending a lifetime on benefits.

Take it from me - being able to speak, write and listen better than any 'English' person doesn't stop a non white from being stuck on benefits.

The left are at least equally, if not more to blame for this as anything and everything they try to do to pander to ethnic minorities does nothing but make us look less and less desirable.

I've seen multiple janitors that couldn't speak a word of English. I try to apply for janitor work and get told I don't have enough references.

Then people blame me for applying for janitor work, and also blame me for being on benefits.

So what exactly do people want from me?

 

[thenewoc]

Take it from me - being able to speak, write and listen better than any 'English' person doesn't stop a non white from being stuck on benefits.

The left are at least equally, if not more to blame for this as anything and everything they try to do to pander to ethnic minorities does nothing but make us look less and less desirable.

I've seen multiple janitors that couldn't speak a word of English. I try to apply for janitor work and get told I don't have enough references.

Maybe but it depends on job demand in a particular area and the size of the population in that area. As for the left, it's their fault because they pursued a policy of letting in as many as they could. Also, if you're chasing unskilled work it's always going to be tough since there may be a huge number of people also applying for such work.

 

[chroniclard]

Maybe but it depends on job demand in a particular area and the size of the population in that area. As for the left, it's their fault because they pursued a policy of letting in as many as they could. Also, if you're chasing unskilled work it's always going to be tough since there may be a huge number of people also applying for such work.

Which left government did this?

 

[BallistixOnZ490]

Maybe but it depends on job demand in a particular area and the size of the population in that area. As for the left, it's their fault because they pursued a policy of letting in as many as they could. Also, if you're chasing unskilled work it's always going to be tough since there may be a huge number of people also applying for such work.

Yes exactly, all jobs are so oversaturated that you now need 2x2 year references for an basic janitor / cafe / I.T jobs.

There are too many applicants and not enough jobs.

Employers post a job that specifies 'no experience required', then get hit with thousands of applicants for just two job positions.

People with degrees cannot even compete, everyone over 25 or even less applying to stack shelves at Tesco already has a degree.

 

[BallistixOnZ490]

Which left government did this?

In case you didn't realise it yet, both Labour and the Conservatives are left wing.

Unrestricted and unlimited immigration has ruined the UK. Tell me exactly what we are doing yet about all the rubber dinghys full of asylum seekers that France keep dumping across the channel?

How is this still not being treated as an atrocity against human rights by the EU against France? Why does Britain always have to take the blame if we then try to 'send them back'?

 

[chroniclard]

In case you didn't realise it yet, both Labour and the Conservatives are left wing.