• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Wolfenstien 2 Vulkan benchmarks:

This is a list of 2015-2016 games where the FuryX falls considerably (copied from B3D forum), when I get back I will post the 2017 list:

Divinity Original Sin 2
980Ti is 20% faster than FuryX @1080p (and 17% faster @1440p), 980 is almost as fast as FuryX @1080p!
http://gamegpu.com/rpg/роллевые/divinity-original-sin-2-test-gpu


Obduction
980Ti is 55% faster than FuryX @1080p(and 30% faster @1440p), 780Ti is delivering the same fps as FuryX @1080p!
http://gamegpu.com/rpg/роллевые/obduction-test-gpu


ABZU
980Ti is 52% faster than FuryX @1080p, (and 30% faster @1440p), 980 is 17% faster than FuryX @1080p as well!
http://gamegpu.com/action-/-fps-/-tps/abzu-test-gpu


War Thunder
980Ti is 15% faster than FuryX @1080p, @1440p it is 25% faster than FuryX, 980 is closely fast as it as well @1080p!
http://gamegpu.com/mmorpg-/-онлайн-игры/war-thunder-1-59-test-gpu


The Technomancer
980Ti is 25% faster than FuryX @1080p (and 17% faster @1440p)! 980 is as equal as well @1080p!
http://gamegpu.com/rpg/роллевые/the-technomancer-test-gpu


Firewatch
980Ti is 25% faster than FuryX @1080p and 1440p, 980 is almost as fast as it as well @1080p!
http://gamegpu.com/action-/-fps-/-tps/firewatch-test-gpu.html


Dragons Dogma Dark Arisen
980Ti is 24% faster than FuryX @4K and @1440p, 980 is as fast as it as well @1440p! (@1080p all cards are CPU limited).
http://gamegpu.com/rpg/rollevye/dragons-dogma-dark-arisen-test-gpu.html


Homeworld: Deserts of Kharak
980Ti is 20% faster than FuryX @4k, though it drops to just 15% @1440p! (@1080p all cards are CPU limited).
http://gamegpu.com/rts-/-strategii/homeworld-deserts-of-kharak-test-gpu.html


Crossout
980Ti is 46% faster than FuryX @1080p, (and 32% faster @1440p), even 980 is faster @1080p!
http://gamegpu.com/mmorpg-/-онлайн-игры/crossout-test-gpu


Mad Max
980Ti is 23% faster than FuryX @1080p, 18% faster @1440p!
http://gamegpu.com/action-/-fps-/-tps/mad-max-test-gpu-2015.html


Call Of Duty Modern Warfare Remastered
980Ti is a whooping 60~72% faster than FuryX @1080p, even a 970 is faster than FuryX! @1440p, the advantage collapses to 25~60%, and regular 980 is equal to FuryX!
http://gamegpu.com/action-/-fps-/-tps/call-of-duty-modern-warfare-remastered-test-gpu

http://www.pcgameshardware.de/Call-of-Duty-Modern-Warfare-Remastered-Spiel-59978/Specials/Benchmark-Test-Review-1234383/

Battleborn
980Ti is 30% faster than FuryX @1080p and 1440p, 980 is equally as fast as the FuryX!
http://www.pcgameshardware.de/Battleborn-Spiel-54612/Specials/Benchmark-Review-1194406/


Homefront: The Revolution
980Ti is 34% faster than FuryX @1080p, and 23% faster @1440p
http://www.overclock3d.net/reviews/gpu_displays/homefront_the_revolution_pc_performance_review/7

http://www.pcgameshardware.de/Homefront-The-Revolution-Spiel-54406/Tests/Benchmarks-Test-1195960/

Assassin's Creed Syndicate
980Ti is 24% faster than FuryX @1080p! 21% faster @1440p! 980 is almost equally as fast!
http://gamegpu.com/action-/-fps-/-tps/assassin-s-creed-syndicate-test-gpu-2015.html

http://www.pcgameshardware.de/Geforce-GTX-1080-Ti-11G-Grafikkarte-265855/Tests/Test-Review-1222421/2/
https://www.computerbase.de/2016-08/msi-geforce-gtx-1060-oder-sapphire-radeon-rx-480/2/#diagramm-assassins-creed-syndicate-1920-1080

Conan Exile
980Ti is 45% than FuryX @1080p, 28% faster @1440p! 980 is as fast as FuryX at both resolutions!
http://gamegpu.com/mmorpg-/-онлайн-игры/conan-exiles-test-gpu


ARK Survival
98Ti is 25% faster than FuryX @1080p, the only resolution that matters.
http://gamegpu.com/mmorpg-/-онлайн-игры/ark-survival-evolved-test-gpu


Styx Shardsw Of Darkness
980Ti is 36% faster than FuryX @1080p, 34% faster @1440p! Even a regular 980 is almost as fast as FuryX @4K!
http://gamegpu.com/rpg/роллевые/styx-shards-of-darkness-test-gpu


Ghost Recon Wildlands
980Ti is 28% faster than FuryX @1080p and @1440p!
http://gamegpu.com/action-/-fps-/-tps/ghost-recon-wildlands-test-gpu


Forza Horizon 3
980Ti is over 50% faster than FuryX @1080p! 40% faster @1440p, even a 980 and a 1060 are faster than FuryX here!
http://gamegpu.com/racing-simulators-/-гонки/forza-horizon-3-test-gpu


Mass Effect Andromeda
980Ti is 23~40% faster than FuryX in Mass effect Andromeda @1080p, 17~30% @1440p! FuryX is barely faster than a 480 or 1060.
http://gamegpu.com/action-/-fps-/-tps/mass-effect-andromeda-test-gpu

http://www.pcgameshardware.de/Mass-Effect-Andromeda-Spiel-55712/Specials/Mass-Effect-Andromeda-1223325/

Anno2205
980Ti is more than 30% faster than FuryX @1080p and 1440p!
https://www.computerbase.de/2017-03/geforce-gtx-1080-ti-test/2/#diagramm-anno-2205-1920-1080

https://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/Performance_Analysis/Anno_2205/3.html
http://www.pcgameshardware.de/Anno-2205-Spiel-55714/Specials/Technik-Test-Benchmarks-1175781/
http://www.guru3d.com/articles_pages/anno_2205_pc_graphics_performance_benchmark_review,7.html

Ultimte Epic Battle Simulator
980Ti is more than 60% faster than FuryX @1080p and 50% faster @1440p, the regular 980 is ahead of the FuryX!
http://gamegpu.com/rts-/-стратегии/ultimate-epic-battle-simulator-test-gpu


Escape from Tarkov
980Ti is more than 35% faster than FuryX @1080p and 1440p! The regular 980 is slightly ahead of the FuryX as well!
http://gamegpu.com/mmorpg-/-онлайн-игры/escape-from-tarkov-alpha-test-gpu


OutLast 2
980Ti is 44% faster than FuryX @1080p and 27% faster @1440p, even the 780Ti is ahead of the FuryX!
http://gamegpu.com/action-/-fps-/-tps/outlast-2-test-gpu


Inner Chains
980Ti is 50% faster than FuryX @1080p and 37% faster @1440p, even the 970 is ahead of the FuryX!
http://gamegpu.com/action-/-fps-/-tps/inner-chains-test-gpu-cpu


Dying Light
980Ti is 40% faster than FuryX @1080p and 27% faster @1440p, the regular 980 is slightly ahead of the FuryX
http://gamegpu.com/action-/-fps-/-tps/dying-light-the-following-test-gpu.html

https://www.overclock3d.net/reviews/gpu_displays/dying_light_the_following_pc_performance_review_-_amd_vs_nvidia/7

Vanquish
980Ti is 84% faster than FuryX @1080p and 40% faster @1440p, even the 970 is ahead of the FuryX!
http://gamegpu.com/action-/-fps-/-tps/vanquish-test-gpu-cpu


RiME
980Ti is 37% faster than FuryX @1080p and 25% faster @1440p, even the 1060 is ahead of the FuryX!
http://gamegpu.com/rpg/ролевые/rime-test-gpu-cpu



ArmA 3
980Ti is 29% faster than FuryX @1080p {the only playable resolution)
http://gamegpu.com/action-/-fps-/-tps/arma-3-test-gpu-cpu


Sudden Strike 4
980Ti is 20% faster than FuryX @1080p
http://www.pcgameshardware.de/Sudden-Strike-4-Spiel-59749/Specials/Benchmarks-Test-Review-Preview-1232271/


Project Cars, Ethan Carter, Alien Isolation all are 25~70% faster on the 980Ti than FuryX
http://www.babeltechreviews.com/fury-x-vs-gtx-980-ti-revisited-36-games-including-watch-dogs-2/3/



Some 2017 titles

Tekken 7
980Ti is 25% faster than FuryX @4K, the only resolution that isn't cpu limited, 980 is almost as fast as the FuryX.
http://gamegpu.com/action-/-fps-/-tps/tekken-7-test-gpu-cpu


Get Even
980Ti is 65% faster than FuryX @1080p and 50% faster @1440p, even the 1060 is ahead of the FuryX!
http://gamegpu.com/action-/-fps-/-tps/get-even-test-gpu-cpu


FortNite
980Ti is 30% faster than FuryX @1080p and 20% faster @1440p
http://gamegpu.com/mmorpg-/-онлайн-игры/fortnite-test-gpu-cpu


Aven Colony
980Ti is 56% faster than FuryX @1080p and 33% faster @1440p, even the 1060 is ahead of the FuryX @1080p!
http://gamegpu.com/rts-/-стратегии/aven-colony-test-gpu-cpu


Agents Of Mayhem
980Ti is 58% faster than FuryX @1080p and 25% faster @1440p, even the 1060 is ahead of the FuryX @1080p!
http://gamegpu.com/action-/-fps-/-tps/agents-of-mayhem-test-gpu-cpu


Law Breaker
980Ti is 25% faster than FuryX @1080p, and 14% faster @1440p
http://gamegpu.com/mmorpg-/-онлайн-игры/lawbreakers-test-gpu-cpu



ACO:
http://www.pcgameshardware.de/Assassins-Creed-Origins-Spiel-61043/Specials/Benchmark-Test-1242105/2/
https://www.computerbase.de/2017-10...2/#diagramm-assassins-creed-origins-1920-1080
http://gamegpu.com/action-/-fps-/-tps/assassin-s-creed-origins-test-gpu-cpu

Wolfenstein 2:
http://www.pcgameshardware.de/Wolfe...us-im-Technik-Test-Benchmarks-Vulkan-1242138/
https://www.computerbase.de/2017-10...nstein-2-1920-1080-anspruchsvolle-testsequenz
http://gamegpu.com/action-/-fps-/-tps/wolfenstein-ii-the-new-colossus-test-gpu-cpu

Evil 2:
http://gamegpu.com/action-/-fps-/-tps/the-evil-within-2-test-gpu-cpu


COD WW2:
http://www.guru3d.com/articles-pages/call-of-duty-ww2-pc-graphics-analysis-benchmark-review,1.html


Shadow Of War
http://gamegpu.com/action-/-fps-/-tps/middle-earth-shadow-of-war-test-gpu-cpu

Forza 7
https://www.computerbase.de/2017-09/forza-7-benchmark/2/#diagramm-forza-7-3840-2160
Never heard of a lot of those games. Modern Warefare remastered wtf. Tekken?
Tekken?
Tekken!?!
2017 games you said. Anyway Battlefront 1, Fallout 4 (after the patch that fixed it before you come back with launch tests) , Doom, Resident evil 7, Destiny 2, Sniper elite, Prey. I could look through for more but my point is made that modern games they are doing just fine. Game dependant really. I'm sure Far Cry 5 and Battlefront will be close too looking ahead.
 
Never heard of a lot of those games. Modern Warefare remastered wtf. Tekken?
Tekken?
Tekken!?!
2017 games you said. Anyway Battlefront 1, Fallout 4 (after the patch that fixed it before you come back with launch tests) , Doom, Resident evil 7, Destiny 2, Sniper elite, Prey. I could look through for more but my point is made that modern games they are doing just fine. Game dependant really. I'm sure Far Cry 5 and Battlefront will be close too looking ahead.


Did you see Shadow Of War, Evil Within 2, Wolfenstein 2, ASSASSIN'S ORIGINS, Forza 7, Fortnite, COD WW2 in there as well?

For God's sake even AMD's reddit is full of complaint over this and you're are just brushing it off like it's nothing?
https://www.reddit.com/r/Amd/comments/7asbw8/is_amd_not_longer_optimizing_older_gcn_iterations/

This is serious stuff, the card is seriously under performing badly, this is Kepler bad aging stuff, and it's going to get even worse as modern gaming goes.

Oh and Destiny 2 shows the same thing basically
http://gamegpu.com/action-/-fps-/-tps/destiny-2-test-gpu-cpu

There is also Total Warhammer 2, Project Cars 2, F1 2017 and NFS PAYBACK, I will post the links when I get back home.
 
Last edited:
N
Did you see Shadow Of War, Evil Within 2, Wolfenstein 2, ASSASSIN'S ORIGINS, Forza 7, Fortnite, COD WW2 in there as well?

For God's sake even AMD's reddit is full of complaint over this and you're are just brushing it off like it's nothing?
https://www.reddit.com/r/Amd/comments/7asbw8/is_amd_not_longer_optimizing_older_gcn_iterations/

This is serious stuff, the card is seriously under performing badly, this is Kepler bad aging stuff, and it's going to get even worse as modern gaming goes.

Oh and Destiny 2 shows the same thing basically
http://gamegpu.com/action-/-fps-/-tps/destiny-2-test-gpu-cpu

There is also Total Warhammer 2, Project Cars 2, F1 2017 and NFS PAYBACK, I will post the links when I get back home.
No I didn't just brush it off I'll concede them of course. But a lot of those aren't what id call big titles or even new titles and a lot of them are running at 100fps even on lesser cards so I can discount those. What Im saying is there is plenty of new games utilizing more modern hardware were even a Fury X is holding up against the 1070 which is true
And what's wrong with destiny 2?
http://www.guru3d.com/articles_pages/destiny_2_pc_graphics_performance_benchmark_review,5.html
 
I dont know what im doing wrong but I just installed the game, it set itself to uber mode on my ryzen/vega 64 rig but the on screen, in game fps counter only shows 40fps. fps seems to race up if I move the mouse then settles back to 40fps. ryzen 1700 at 3.9, ddr4 at 3466, vega 64 ac that holds 1640ish in benchmarks with the hbm2 at 1060. 1440p 144hz freesync monitor. installed the latest drivers (17.10.3?) and the windows creators update etc. checking wattman the vega only boosts to 1300 ish and the temps arent hitting any sort of throttling, around the 64c mark. steams fps counter was showing about 65fps. I did run a timespy bench after I installed the new drivers and that was as expected.

Any ideas?

Sounds like you've got Radeon Chill enabled - it's working as it should, but you can configure the FPS targets or turn it off altogether.
 
No I didn't just brush it off I'll concede them of course. But a lot of those aren't what id call big titles or even new titles and a lot of them are running at 100fps even on lesser cards so I can discount those. What Im saying is there is plenty of new games utilizing more modern hardware were even a Fury X is holding up against the 1070 which is true
True, but there is also a great number of games where it is NOT, this is the same thing that happened with Kepler based GPUs, they started falling behind in several titles, they didn't fall in all titles though, but too many titles had them behind that it formed a pattern of aging badly. This is what we have with the Fury line now, crippled with low tessellation output, low VRAM and scarce optimizations, they are now behind in most games, it's logical that AMD will drop support for them as they didn't sell too many of the Fury line to begin with.


Dishonored Death Of Outsider
980Ti is 30% faster than FuryX @1080p and 24% faster @1440p!
gamegpu.com/action-/-fps-/-tps/dishonored-death-of-the-outsider-test-gpu-cpu

Project Cars 2
980Ti is 43% faster than FuryX @ 1080p and 25% faster @1440p!
http://www.pcgameshardware.de/Proje...Specials/Benchmark-Test-Grafikkarten-1238952/
https://www.overclock3d.net/reviews/software/project_cars_2_pc_performance_review/9
http://pclab.pl/art75527-5.html
http://www.benchmark.pl/testy_i_recenzje/project-cars2-test/strona/28644.html
https://www.computerbase.de/2017-09...afikkartenbenchmarks_von_full_hd_bis_ultra_hd
https://www.purepc.pl/karty_graficz...jnosci_kart_graficznych_i_procesorow?page=0,7

F1 2017
GTX1070 is 20% faster than FuryX @ 1080p and 1440p
https://www.computerbase.de/2017-08/f1-2017-pc-benchmark/2/#diagramm-f1-2017-1920-1080

Total War Warhammer 2
980Ti is 40% faster than FuryX @ 1080p, and 35% faster @1440p, even a GTX 1060 is equal or faster than FuryX
http://gamegpu.com/rts-/-стратегии/total-war-warhammer-ii-test-gpu-cpu
http://www.pcgameshardware.de/Total...60823/Specials/Benchmark-Test-Review-1240653/

Destiny 2
980Ti is 25% faster than FuryX @ 1080p
http://gamegpu.com/action-/-fps-/-tps/destiny-2-test-gpu-cpu
https://www.computerbase.de/2017-10/destiny-2-benchmark/2/#diagramm-destiny-2-1920-1080
http://www.pcgameshardware.de/Desti...Destiny-2-PC-Technik-Test-Benchmarks-1241945/
http://www.guru3d.com/articles_pages/destiny_2_pc_graphics_performance_benchmark_review,4.html
https://overclock3d.net/reviews/software/destiny_2_pc_performance_review/8

Assassin's Creed Origins
980Ti is 22% faster than FuryX @ 1080p and 25% faster @1440p, even 980 is equal to FuryX!
http://gamegpu.com/action-/-fps-/-tps/assassin-s-creed-origins-test-gpu-cpu
http://www.pcgameshardware.de/Assassins-Creed-Origins-Spiel-61043/Specials/Benchmark-Test-1242105/2/
https://www.computerbase.de/2017-10...2/#diagramm-assassins-creed-origins-1920-1080
http://www.benchmark.pl/testy_i_recenzje/assassins-creed-origins-wrazenia-i-testy/strona/28834.html
https://overclock3d.net/reviews/software/assassin_s_creed_origins_pc_performance_review/8
http://wccftech.com/assassins-creed-origins-graphics-card-performance/
https://www.purepc.pl/karty_graficz...n_s_creed_origins_problemy_w_egipcie?page=0,9

The Evil Within 2
980Ti is 22% faster than FuryX @ 1080p
http://gamegpu.com/action-/-fps-/-tps/the-evil-within-2-test-gpu-cpu


Call Of Duty WW2
980Ti is 35% faster than FuryX @ 1080p, and 25% faster @1440p
http://www.pcgameshardware.de/Call-...-of-Duty-WW2-Technik-Test-Benchmarks-1242690/
https://www.computerbase.de/2017-11...afikkartenbenchmarks_von_full_hd_bis_ultra_hd
http://gamegpu.com/action-/-fps-/-tps/call-of-duty-wwii-test-gpu-cpu
http://www.guru3d.com/articles_pages/call_of_duty_ww2_pc_graphics_analysis_benchmark_review,4.html

Wolfenstein 2:
980Ti is 50% faster than FuryX @ 1080p and 1440p
http://www.pcgameshardware.de/Wolfe...us-im-Technik-Test-Benchmarks-Vulkan-1242138/
https://www.computerbase.de/2017-10...nstein-2-1920-1080-anspruchsvolle-testsequenz
http://gamegpu.com/action-/-fps-/-tps/wolfenstein-ii-the-new-colossus-test-gpu-cpu

Shadow Of War
980Ti is 20% faster @ 1080p, and 50% faster @1440p
http://gamegpu.com/action-/-fps-/-tps/middle-earth-shadow-of-war-test-gpu-cpu
http://www.pcgameshardware.de/Mitte...erde-Schatten-des-Krieges-Benchmarks-1240756/
https://www.computerbase.de/2017-10...amm-mittelerde-schatten-des-krieges-2560-1440

Forza 7
980Ti is 30% faster @ 1080p and 1440p
https://www.computerbase.de/2017-09/forza-7-benchmark/2/#diagramm-forza-7-3840-2160
https://nl.hardware.info/reviews/76...ideokaarten-testresultaten-ultra-hd-3840x2160
 
This game was so last week its all about CODWW2 now!!!!!!! :p

P.S both are probably the worse in each the series IMO and it seems by my reading many.
 
With HBCC you can enable 10K textures via editing the local config, see 14GB of video memory usage and no FPS drop at all.
 
They basically did and it was called Turbocache, what GPU can make use of anywhere near 12TB (bits vs Bytes FYI).

You honestly do not think they could make something similar to your snake oil App?

You really think I care with 11GB and before that 12GB of VRAM? :rolleyes:

Anyhow I'm over this game, seems the 1080Ti was king in the benches at all RES (I do not care about 1080 or Vega for that matter).
 
I prefer actually having more VRAM not Turbocache. ;)
Don't be so quick to knock it if you haven't used it.

Here is 16K Textures (default max 4K) and 16K Shadows (default max 4K) using 20GB of video memory on a card that has only 8GB and it is buttery smooth, FPS have only dropped by around 15 from default max 4K settings.
2.png

3.png

Try my config and see what performance you get with 11GB of video memory and no HBCC?

Place it here.
FtWbHrd.jpg

https://www.sendspace.com/file/mj80tr
 
I already said I'm over this game, completed and removed and moved on to another poor release called CODWW2.

Again I would rather have actual VRAM than a Turbocache type feature.

Enjoy your GPU and benching.
 
They basically did and it was called Turbocache, what GPU can make use of anywhere near 12TB (bits vs Bytes FYI).

You honestly do not think they could make something similar to your snake oil App?

You really think I care with 11GB and before that 12GB of VRAM? :rolleyes:

Anyhow I'm over this game, seems the 1080Ti was king in the benches at all RES (I do not care about 1080 or Vega for that matter).

FYI "2" Tb not 12 and GPUs used for 3D workloads like modeling can make use of the massive amount of available memory.
Real time video creation also benefits, did you not see the amd video editing real time 8k footage very nvidia? Let me tell you it was a one hose race.

HBCC isn't just for gaming FYI

And who in the right mind says no to anything that gives you the possibility to add more to a system?
 
Last edited:
Don't be so quick to knock it if you haven't used it.

Here is 16K Textures (default max 4K) and 16K Shadows (default max 4K) using 20GB of video memory on a card that has only 8GB and it is buttery smooth, FPS have only dropped by around 15 from default max 4K settings.
2.png

3.png

Try my config and see what performance you get with 11GB of video memory and no HBCC?

Place it here.
FtWbHrd.jpg

https://www.sendspace.com/file/mj80tr

Nice matt, his post just reeks of hate because nvidia don't have this feature...

We continue enjoying higher res graphics than what nvidia can do :)
 
Back
Top Bottom