World Trade Center Dust Contains Evidence of Explosives

As I say this is just one theard about this,there are more and I would(like most have)
read them and click on the links, study,cross reff it all.

So let me get this straight. You want me to go trawling through a number of different threads, perhaps on a number of different forums, just to find evidence to support your case? I don't think so.

As I understand it, a debate works by you providing the evidence for your side. To expect the opposition to do all the work for you does not seem very sporting. I might as well just have the debate with myself, then let you know how I got on.

Please, if there is something I have missed in this thread, humour me and post a link back to the relevent page. If there is another thread, post a link to that. I've looked at plenty of info on conspiracy theories and I would consider searching through that pile of manure further, just to try and find a few nuggets of genuine evidence to be a complete waste of my time.
 
So let me get this straight. You want me to go trawling through a number of different threads, perhaps on a number of different forums, just to find evidence to support your case? I don't think so.

As I understand it, a debate works by you providing the evidence for your side. To expect the opposition to do all the work for you does not seem very sporting. I might as well just have the debate with myself, then let you know how I got on.

Please, if there is something I have missed in this thread, humour me and post a link back to the relevent page. If there is another thread, post a link to that. I've looked at plenty of info on conspiracy theories and I would consider searching through that pile of manure further, just to try and find a few nuggets of genuine evidence to be a complete waste of my time.


I am going to work now..BUT if you really want to know do as I did(and others) and read the posts.
You just can't come into a thread and post with out reading the thread.
i.e the BNP thread is now over 100 pages YET people still read it all because tahts the right way to do it.

Have a fun read click on the links and learn. And by the way I have never said that anyone did it
I have a open mind :) best thing to have in these troubled days.
 
Why so evasive? Surely at least a page number is not too much to ask?

I do not like the implication that I am simply not interested enough in the truth. All I am asking for is a little guidance finding the truth in the afore mentioned pile of manure.
 
Why so evasive? Surely at least a page number is not too much to ask?

I do not like the implication that I am simply not interested enough in the truth. All I am asking for is a little guidance finding the truth in the afore mentioned pile of manure.

He hasn't got any points. All the points he keeps brining up time and time again have all been proved to be lies or twisted.

Some people like to stick their head in the sand, because changing heir opinion would be so wrong.
 
So, guy is an employee of a government agency (like tens of thousands of other), he's a photographer who provides pool footage of the inside of the collapsed towers (fairly standard sort of thing to prevent risks to too many people and as it's not practical to let everyone in who might want pics*).
His wife commits suicide under potentially suspicious circumstances and the police investigate (he ends up in jail for a while as they initially think he was involved).

He (in his words) gets let go by Fema as he is "tainted", and in retaliation lies to them refusing to hand over footage he'd taken - regardless of how he was treated by FEMA that would be breach of contract at the very least, potentially a fairly serious criminal matter if the footage was considered "evidence" which it could well have been.

He runs to Argentina and asks for political asylum, the US asks for him to be extradited, repeatedly.

I don't see much of a conspiracy more of a bitter person, who has been let down by his wife, boss and as he sees it legal system, who decided that it would be a good idea to screw with a major criminal investigation and a chance to make a potential profit from his "theories".



*Much the same reason at most large political events, or things like plane crashes (during the investigation), Shuttle Launches etc there will be "pool" cameras either operated by staff or by a very small number of news agencies under an agreement that the footage is shared.
 
So, guy is an employee of a government agency (like tens of thousands of other), he's a photographer who provides pool footage of the inside of the collapsed towers (fairly standard sort of thing to prevent risks to too many people and as it's not practical to let everyone in who might want pics*).
His wife commits suicide under potentially suspicious circumstances and the police investigate (he ends up in jail for a while as they initially think he was involved).

He (in his words) gets let go by Fema as he is "tainted", and in retaliation lies to them refusing to hand over footage he'd taken - regardless of how he was treated by FEMA that would be breach of contract at the very least, potentially a fairly serious criminal matter if the footage was considered "evidence" which it could well have been.

He runs to Argentina and asks for political asylum, the US asks for him to be extradited, repeatedly.

I don't see much of a conspiracy more of a bitter person, who has been let down by his wife, boss and as he sees it legal system, who decided that it would be a good idea to screw with a major criminal investigation and a chance to make a potential profit from his "theories".



*Much the same reason at most large political events, or things like plane crashes (during the investigation), Shuttle Launches etc there will be "pool" cameras either operated by staff or by a very small number of news agencies under an agreement that the footage is shared.


I agree with some of that, but i can't wait to see the video and pics
and the pic of the tires is very good i just got it into CS4 and see whats what.

And I have been waiting a long tiime to see pics of the void in the basement.
 
I had to ask somewhere, the other thread being closed and all.

Rroff said:
WTC7 was a controlled demolition - but not directly part of any conspiracy. Why they changed the details after the fact to cover up the fact it was brought down on purpose I don't know - but it certainly wasn't any shady government reasons.

It was massively destabalised but not in immediate danager of collapse, its possible concerns for its integrity were hampering rescue efforts and they decided to bring it down to get the problem out the way.

What....
 
Last edited:
Honestly I find it amazing people actually believe in so many conspiracy theories. I understand not taking everything at face value, but sometimes I am just astounded at what people believe...
 
Thread was going nowhere fast anyhow...

RE: AcidHell - Its my personal opinion based on events of that day - I used to play in a US gaming clan (Eternal Killing Machine if you really care), on the day of 9/11 I was sitting in TS with a bunch of them playing quake 3 - one of the guys lives in Manhattan with a good view of WTC7 and was giving us a blow by blow account of events as they happened.
 
so they had time in just a few hours to go in and rig explosives up. Please. Go have a look at the time line and what was happening around it. That is even less founded than half the CTs.
 
Back
Top Bottom