1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

world war III

Discussion in 'General Discussion' started by LabR@t, Jul 25, 2006.

  1. WIBSBOT

    Hitman

    Joined: Sep 26, 2003

    Posts: 834

    Location: essex

    But why start this when you are getting the land back ?

    It's like two kids, one a big bully and the other a small weedy kid. Big bully nicks small kids sweets. Big bully is about to hand sweets back, and then small kid kicks big bully in the knackers. Doesn't make sense to me. :confused:
     
  2. Glaucus

    Man of Honour

    Joined: Mar 11, 2004

    Posts: 76,645


    humm can we kill this quote its stupid. WW4 would be fought with nukes and guns. eaxcatly as WW3 wqould be fought.
    Theres huge underground bunkers with all are technology in. Scientists would be sent there in the event of WW3... So you would have a much reduced population, and limited infastructure, but the know how would be there to build such technology.

    And no I dont think were heading for WW3..