- Joined
- 17 Nov 2003
- Posts
- 36,747
- Location
- Southampton, UK
OS X would be horrible (performance wise) if it was shelled out like Windows is across multiple pc-configurations, in my opinion.
Why?
Burnsy
OS X would be horrible (performance wise) if it was shelled out like Windows is across multiple pc-configurations, in my opinion.
Why?
Burnsy
I wouldn't mind OS X's Bluetooth support in WindowsI wouldn't say "Windows 4 life"... but to be honest OSX just isn't that good. It offers little over and above what any Linux distro does, other than perhaps a few bits of specialist software and a arguably "slick" UI (although IMO I think XP looked more modern...)
Only based on UNIX? In what way is that a bad thing?
This is complete rubbish; OSX is Unix based, sure but it is not Linux.Nope, OSX = Linux anyway. Plus I can't live without my games, if game developers started making games for Linux/OSX then I'd definitely consider it.
Well you're wrong. Unless you mean "basically it's an OS", in which case Windows is the same.
Do you consider doing things differently to every other OS an advantage?windows is completly different to OS X, Linux has its similarities.
and imo a lot of linux distros look much better than apple os x.
Any examples of this? Just for reference.
Please don't post a beryl screenshot or I'll be forced to take you out.
Looks like a standard SuSE theme to me
Edit: And an OS X wannabe doesn't count. The Dock is a lot more than a launcher.
I wouldn't switch to OSX but also I wouldn't stay with windows just because. OSX has a very interesting future ahead and I'd be very interested to see what it looks like in 2 - 3 years.
Vista for me is the best desktop operating system. Although, I do dual boot my laptop with Vista and XUbuntu.
Interesting that you say it was laggy considering Vista's desktop is rendered by the GPU and OSX's is rendered by the CPUI've used vista on a mate C2D lappy and a C2D/X1900XT desktop and it was just laggy, the UI was a mess and it was just annoying :/