Caporegime
- Joined
- 12 Mar 2009
- Posts
- 26,776
you know immediately after E3 i was dead set on buying a PS4 but the more i think about it logically i keep coming back to wanting a XBO am i mad?
What's your logic?
you know immediately after E3 i was dead set on buying a PS4 but the more i think about it logically i keep coming back to wanting a XBO am i mad?
Threads are not hives of lovins and circlejerks where only happy news is allowed. If the news in any form is relevant to the thread, then it should go in the thread.
What's your logic?
i don't trade games anyway, i only play a handful of games, i am more of a casual gamer and enjoy the media side of entertainment, voice commands suit my general laziness, etc etc
Depending on how important voice commands are to you the other requirements aren't only available on Xbox One.
You have stated that you're not going to buy the XB1, so you've taken on the responsibility of posting any news that you find detrimental to MS sales?
I've already reported your posts to the mods for trolling, and I think someone asked you this before... Why are you still in this thread?
Lol, what rubbish. They dont need DRM for the console business to survive. They need really good, well priced games.
lol? The potential for losing access to all your games is fairly pertinent information. I wasn't going to buy the XB1 because of existing DRM issues, but definetly won't now.
Opening the case of your console breaches ToS IIRC correctly from Xbox 360. So in effect if they put some kind of sensor in the XB1 you could get banned for cleaning the heatsink.
no publishers refuse to publish on either platform.
WOW....
Extreme.
No publisher will refuse to release games on either platform with or without DRM. They would lose far too much money.
If they could potentially sell 5 million copies of a game on a platform without DRM then that's still £200 million+money from DLC.
It might not be something they wish to embrace though, especially with a direct alternative in the PS4.
I have to say, what Microsoft are doing there seems foolish (for a variety of reasons).
The original intention was to get all the Multiplayer servers not requiring 3rd party costs (Like EA shutting down game servers to cut costs), as well as taking all the games that servers hosted by the clients (Halo, etc), and have all that compute done in the cloud allowing more CPU cycles for gameplay. That will really expand what developers can do. Anything that doesn’t need per frame calculation and can handle 100ms delays can be shifted to the cloud. That’s huge.
Anyone seen this yet?
Xbox engineer reveals Microsoft’s true intentions with DRM on the Xbox One
http://vr-zone.com/articles/xbox-en...ntentions-with-drm-on-the-xbox-one/37547.html
Assuming he is genuine, the upshot is:
- MS are looking at Steam as their 'insipiration' for XB1 and want to create that kind of digital system for the XB1
- Their intension is that with Steam like account locks on games, games will become cheaper as they have done with Steam.
Overall it's a pretty good justification for the approach that MS has taken (IMO) - however what puzzles me is that as far as I can see, MS seem to has not really come out and explained the consumer benefits of their approach in the way that guy does.
If it does turn out be the case, then I can see myself being much more likely to get an XB1, but I have a feeling I'll need to wait a year or two to see how everything works out.
The xbox one ecosystem will end up like steam eventually. And no doubt the PS4 will too.
A few years down the line the DRM we end up with will be normal, both consoles will have roughly the same controls and this whole debate will have gone.
This bit s also potentially massive
They specifically mention taking games that hosted by clients, and hosting them on the Microsoft cloud platform, at a free cost to developers and publishers.
"The cloud capabilities is the @*%# they like the most. We basically made a huge cloud compute @%#! and made it free"
How game changing would it be if games like COD had dedicated servers on xb1 but not PS4 ??
Why is it rubbish? There is plenty of talk from journalists and insiders who have said that MS have a long term strategy that they are putting over very badly, through seriously poor communication.What a load of ********. If this was the case MS could have just said that, and with the games being cheaper the gamers probably would have accepted it as a trade off. Next there going to tell us that God told them to do it for the greater good of mankind
the integration of current media devices (sky/freeview etc) is very interesting however don't you think?
lol? The potential for losing access to all your games is fairly pertinent information. I wasn't going to buy the XB1 because of existing DRM issues, but definetly won't now.
I don't really understand why it is being flaunted as a selling point, maybe there are people who can utilise it somehow but in a configuration such as mine where your box is already plugged in and not concealed I think it's pointless. I still need two devices in that cabinet either way.
You have stated that you're not going to buy the XB1, so you've taken on the responsibility of posting any news that you find detrimental to MS sales?
I've already reported your posts to the mods for trolling, and I think someone asked you this before... Why are you still in this thread?