As I've said a few times regarding remakes, I think there are only two reasonable ways to believe a remake is necessary:
a - The original was commercially bad and yours is better
b - You're telling a different take on the original story (like Total Recall remake stayed closer to the book than Arnies film)
However the recent obsession of remaking a film AND gender-swapping the lead role has ensured than none of these films has been better received (through the box office) than the films/franchises they're based on, so I wonder why Hollywood is still so adamant about "throwing away" money when that money could be used, in this case, for a stand-alone female climber film in the wilderness which doesn't "need" to cling to the coat-tails of Cliffhanger to try and be successful?
Are they saying that female characters are so badly performing that the only way they can succeed is if they use male roles which are recast?
Anyway, here's the press report - https://uk.movies.yahoo.com/femalel...ic-cliffhanger-is-in-the-works-114231703.html
a - The original was commercially bad and yours is better
b - You're telling a different take on the original story (like Total Recall remake stayed closer to the book than Arnies film)
However the recent obsession of remaking a film AND gender-swapping the lead role has ensured than none of these films has been better received (through the box office) than the films/franchises they're based on, so I wonder why Hollywood is still so adamant about "throwing away" money when that money could be used, in this case, for a stand-alone female climber film in the wilderness which doesn't "need" to cling to the coat-tails of Cliffhanger to try and be successful?
Are they saying that female characters are so badly performing that the only way they can succeed is if they use male roles which are recast?
Anyway, here's the press report - https://uk.movies.yahoo.com/femalel...ic-cliffhanger-is-in-the-works-114231703.html