Your post is a bit ambiguous. What's in the walls of your house? My Netomnia/YouFibre ONT is right next to my Openreach one. I run OPNsense (so basically the same) bare metal. I just unplugged their router, plugged in mine and rebooted the ONT. I got a CGNAT address for a few minutes, but by the time I'd set up the rest of the config it refreshed to my static IP, no need to spoof MACs or call them.Currently on BT 900 and my contract expires in a few months. We can get YouFibre round here and their 1000 up/down package sounds appealing (faster upload and cheaper). I would need a static IP to avoid CGNAT. I run pfsense virtualised - does anyone on here do similar (or baremetal pfSense at least)? Sounds like they require a fixed MAC address, some people online saying they needed to phone them up, others saying it updates automatically after a while.
Does anyone have pictures of their install of the fibre and ONT. All of my network equipment is currently in the same room that my OpenReach fibre goes into (within the walls from when our house was built), along with the ONT. I'm pretty sure they wouldn't route their fibre to the same place as it'd require quite a bit of work in my house to get there (neatly at least). Thinking I could get them to bring it in at the front of the house and then I could run my own ethernet from there...
2001:etc:etc::1
rather than the 2001:etc:etc:etc:etc:etc:etc:etc
address it pulled automatically). Now I have the neater short IP ending in ::1
as the LAN interface IP, and DHCPv6 running on LAN to serve addresses on a /64 from ::2000
to ::ffff
. I use the ::1
as the router/DNS address, then ::2
to ::1999
range as static allocation.Your post is a bit ambiguous. What's in the walls of your house? My Netomnia/YouFibre ONT is right next to my Openreach one. I run OPNsense (so basically the same) bare metal. I just unplugged their router, plugged in mine and rebooted the ONT. I got a CGNAT address for a few minutes, but by the time I'd set up the rest of the config it refreshed to my static IP, no need to spoof MACs or call them.
Annoyingly, they don't email you the static IP allocation, and OPNsense pulled a random IP from the /56 to use on LAN. I used a subnet calculator to find the first IP (i.e.2001:etc:etc::1
rather than the2001:etc:etc:etc:etc:etc:etc:etc
address it pulled automatically). Now I have the neater short IP ending in::1
as the LAN interface IP, and DHCPv6 running on LAN to serve addresses on a /64 from::2000
to::ffff
. I use the::1
as the router/DNS address, then::2
to::1999
range as static allocation.
Edit: BTW, the IPv4 on WAN shows as a /28, but alas it is only a /32 (I tried the rest of the range using 1:1 NAT).
Honestly? All day, every day - and twice on Sundays. My latency to London has gone down from 10-12ms (Openreach) to 2ms(!), bufferbloat rating is A without any shaper/SQM/tweaks, and it's just so snappy and immediate. Then you remember you have 2 gigs each way... I wish I'd switched last year.It sounds like I should be able to get everything configured and working how I have it now with a bit of re-configuration, which I'm ok with. What I need to weigh up is the additional eyesore vs additional upload speed (and the cost saving!).
$ ping -c 4 -i 0.5 dns.quad9.net
PING dns.quad9.net (9.9.9.9): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=0 ttl=59 time=2.094 ms
64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=1 ttl=59 time=2.284 ms
64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=2 ttl=59 time=2.028 ms
64 bytes from 9.9.9.9: icmp_seq=3 ttl=59 time=2.132 ms
--- dns.quad9.net ping statistics ---
4 packets transmitted, 4 packets received, 0.0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 2.028/2.135/2.284/0.094 ms
$ ping6 -c 4 -i 0.5 dns.controld.com
PING6(56=40+8+8 bytes) xxxx:xxxx:xxxx::10 --> 2606:1a40::22
16 bytes from 2606:1a40::22, icmp_seq=0 hlim=58 time=3.050 ms
16 bytes from 2606:1a40::22, icmp_seq=1 hlim=58 time=2.732 ms
16 bytes from 2606:1a40::22, icmp_seq=2 hlim=58 time=2.936 ms
16 bytes from 2606:1a40::22, icmp_seq=3 hlim=58 time=2.863 ms
--- dns.controld.com ping6 statistics ---
4 packets transmitted, 4 packets received, 0.0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/std-dev = 2.732/2.895/3.050/0.115 ms
13 3 ms 3 ms 3 ms controld-edge1-lhr.anycast.net [2a00:dd80:3a::a48]
14 3 ms 3 ms 3 ms freedns.controld.com [2606:1a40::22]
Yeah you're right, I followed up with traceroute6 and see the same. Regardless, I've never seen pings below 8 on Openreach to any destination, so this is a significant improvement.You must be hitting anycast targets, 2ms from London to Liverpool and back is too low. Even Vodafone's carrier network can only get between Manchester and London in around 6ms. The final two hops on a traceroute to your second target look like this for me:
Code:13 3 ms 3 ms 3 ms controld-edge1-lhr.anycast.net [2a00:dd80:3a::a48] 14 3 ms 3 ms 3 ms freedns.controld.com [2606:1a40::22]
Probably move back, tbh. Martin/Aquiss were flawless for me, it's a real old fashioned decent ISP and it's nice to be able to speak directly to someone who can sort issues, and knows their onions. YouFibre don't have an online account portal (yet), don't send details of the (paid) static IP allocations, little things. On the converse, YouFibre are part of Netomnia, so you are dealing direct if something goes wrong. I don't think they wholesale out their network anyway, but it's an interesting thought.Nice. If Aquiss starts offering over Netomnia would you switch back or stay put?
No issues here bud.Is anyone else able to ping 8.8.8.8 on their YouFibre connection.
My switch has an internet light that pings Google and I noticed it was off, I have internet fine and I reach cloudflare no issues but googles dns - not liking it.
$ ping -c 4 -i 0.5 8.8.8.8
PING 8.8.8.8 (8.8.8.8) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=1 ttl=118 time=7.33 ms
64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=2 ttl=118 time=7.02 ms
64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=3 ttl=118 time=7.36 ms
64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=4 ttl=118 time=7.30 ms
--- 8.8.8.8 ping statistics ---
4 packets transmitted, 4 received, 0% packet loss, time 1503ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 7.022/7.251/7.361/0.134 ms