One thing to bare in mind here - IvyBridge-E for stuff like Cinebench performs best at 2133-2400MHz with tight timings - though not a huge deal you will easily actually lose 1-2% with faster RAM (and looser timings) and possibly even as much as 5% down at 1600MHz CL9 versus faster RAM.
-
Competitor rules
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Zen = Sandybridge IPC
- Thread starter RavenXXX2
- Start date
One thing to bare in mind here - IvyBridge-E for stuff like Cinebench performs best at 2133-2400MHz with tight timings - though not a huge deal you will easily actually lose 1-2% with faster RAM (and looser timings) and possibly even as much as 5% down at 1600MHz CL9 versus faster RAM.
Associate
- Joined
- 9 Jan 2019
- Posts
- 885
Its already started, Principled Technologies noob approach to testing was not long ago.
Maybe they should have a youtube channel.
I have always wondered how many "individuals" on tech forums are actually part of a coordinated group. It definitely happens and i bet most companies have shills of some sort, just Intel ones are really easy to spot at the moment.
Maybe they should have a youtube channel.
I have always wondered how many "individuals" on tech forums are actually part of a coordinated group. It definitely happens and i bet most companies have shills of some sort, just Intel ones are really easy to spot at the moment.
Caporegime
Ryan Shrout was worst for this, a lot of very obvious Intel and nVidia shilling from him in the past decade, of course it turns out he has been on Intel's pay role for some years and now works for them officially.
his Channel went to **** no one watched it, literally he would get 42 views on his Twitch live streams.
There are a couple i trust, Steve: Hardware Jesus, in his last video he laid down the ground work for Ryzen 3000 testing and ran some pre benchmarks with Coffeelake and Zen+, it all looks in order.... Steve from Hardware Unboxed is a very good reviewer doing huge 30+ game benchmarks and those detailed proper IPC comparison tests.
I'm unsure about JayZ2Cents, he rarely does CPU game benchmarks but when he does they seem to be right, tho he has been rumbled with his 8700K reviews being on Asus all core 4.7Ghz boosts and went into i'm daft mode pretending he didn't know...
His last video was pretty good.
I'm not writing Chris off yet but if his results differ significantly from the two Steves i'm un-subbing from his channel.
I have expected a more meaningful response than this.
Caporegime
Still rocking my 8320 here
My condolences.
Best value CPU I have owned. Had it for 5 years and it still runs everything fine. Simply no reason to upgrade!
Caporegime
I suppose as far as a consistent experience, then sure it's been spectacular value as they were cheap.
Can't say the same for any GPU's.
Lol so we have gone from sandybridge ipc to faster than haswell in two videos, this guy is out of his depth.
Soldato
Well,I looked at some Fallout 4 results in general and Ryzen 2000 seems close to Broadwell level performance in the game when the systems are run at stock settings. Skylake onwards had a good performance jump in the game.
Caporegime
Yup, much like Arma III and ROTR did it probably needs a Ryzen patch
not that it'll ever get one.Yeah... well at least his subscribers managed to get through to him and he's found a problem with his tests.
I'll give him points for fessing up.
No. It hasn't worked. If the only purpose is to lie, then he failed.
Because he lost credence, people will not watch follow up videos.
He has already posted another video which includes revised results that are closer to what everyone expected. Whether or not he did this as a marketing ploy is up for debate, what with the new Ryzen lineup having so much hype. I would say he just messed up, as it doesn't really shine him in a good light. What's weird is that quite a few people said his other IPC tests were very good (I haven't seen them, though).
As they say though, any exposure is good exposure.
As they say though, any exposure is good exposure.
No, they won't. People click stuff which they want to see or are interesting in to read, not some random trolling of excrement youtubers.
what like jake paul ? anything that makes you click on the video works. doesnt have to be good true just so you click it. a few pc nerds wont out of principle most will. even most of those nerds to see if he does something wrong in his next video so it can be pointed out. pie chart style. so he has a new audience now and will get more subs and views regardless. its worked for him. we are in a tech forum discussing his videos right now. he has done what he set out to be achieved. surely you can see this .