Tada!!!
I find that installation kit, complete with tube of "general purpose silicone", both endearing and hilarious.
The guy's got a point though - 10Gb split across 300 subscribers isn't a lot of capacity, and prevents the sale of high value business-grade services. It also sounds like the topology is subscriber -> chassis switch -> backhaul, so you'd better hope that the switches are intelligent enough to do QoS otherwise some expensive upgrades will be needed to cover subscriber growth.
I fully commend these community FTTH efforts, but I think wireless has a potential that is yet to be realised as well.
Are you going deeper? That looks too shallow!
It's up. First test immediately after connection was 500 up 900 down.
Wireless should not be viewed as an alternative to FTTH. There is no alternative, FTTH is the most reliable and fastest way to deliver data. Every year furthers the need for widespread FTTH.
All other data delivery methods suffer from interference, limited range and reliability. They are all antiquated.
Once the rest of Europe completely humiliates us Broadband speed/reliability wise, the government will be forced to step in and fund a full FTTH rollout.
I shall have to have a conversation with Gigaclear I think..
As although the speed is fast... it is not what I signed up for!
If they can't deliver it after no doubt jumping through a load of test hoops and bull**** I will downgrade the service to their 200/200 for about half the cost!
Current speeds tonight on their test page..