Caporegime
- Joined
- 18 Oct 2002
- Posts
- 29,874
No, but a 39" 5160x2160 240hz oled is planned for next year by LG apparently (according to leaked roadmap).
2024 OLED bonanza take your pick from dozens of new monitors
- Thread starter Grim5
- Start date
Soldato
Strange, hopefully one pops up out the blue, next year is a long way away too wait the LG, seems like am obvious gap in the market.
Many people are waiting for this format, so fingers crossed.
Soldato
Seen the ASUs 32 oled is limited to 65% brightness when using usbc power delivery.
Well that’s a deal breaker for me
Well that’s a deal breaker for me
Associate
What a strange limitation?!
Probably psu limitation
Does it have a radiator on the back?
This is only if you enable the additional power delivery up to 90W, above the standard 65W. The user manual says:
65 W: The USB Type-C port provides 65W power supply.
90 W: The USB Type-C port provides 90W power supply. The maximum brightness will be 65
Last edited:
it has a custom heatsink and graphene film if that's what you mean
Thats nice and should reduce the risk of burn in then
Soldato
yeh but I need 90w
Last edited:
Its a shame a little, they must have cheaped out on a psu then - I presume no hdr with PD too.yeh but I need 90w
Last edited:
On a different topic, was researching the matter of DP 1.4 vs DP 2.1 and DSC
Evaluating if waiting for a monitor with DP 2.1 is of any benefit for the F word*
Apparently since the only graphics cards with DP 2.1 right now are RDNA3, and they only support up to UHBR 13.5, they also need to use DSC to achieve 4k@240Hz.
And there is no information whether the custom scalers in monitors would support UHBR20 either (or if near future cards would support it)
So if DSC is your concern, forget it. No disadvantage (except Nvidias shoddy implementation) and probably no way around it at least this year.
*futureproofing is a curse word on these forums
Evaluating if waiting for a monitor with DP 2.1 is of any benefit for the F word*
Apparently since the only graphics cards with DP 2.1 right now are RDNA3, and they only support up to UHBR 13.5, they also need to use DSC to achieve 4k@240Hz.
And there is no information whether the custom scalers in monitors would support UHBR20 either (or if near future cards would support it)
So if DSC is your concern, forget it. No disadvantage (except Nvidias shoddy implementation) and probably no way around it at least this year.
*futureproofing is a curse word on these forums
Soldato
Wondering same, I believe it won't really matter since they'll both need DSC but could be wrong
It wouldn’t matter but generally displayport behaves better and has less bugs. HDMI is harder for manufacturers to test and tends to be more of a focus for external devices, games consoles etc as the assumption is that for pc people will use DP instead
Fair enough. I’ll test how bright it gets at 65% brightness for youyeh but I need 90w
Soldato
Fair enough. I’ll test how bright it gets at 65% brightness for you
I’ll test and just return if any issues