McCanns going too far?

Toxicology reports on the strands — which could show if the four-year-old had been given any medication — have also been described by sources as “significant”.
Overdosed on medication that was left lying in the apartment?

The thought of the neglect charges, that Doctors should know better and that their careers would be ruined....

Just a though...
 
Was reading in one of the papers today the fund set up to find the kid will be allowed to fund the defence case of the mccans,people donated so the money would be used in the hunt to find the kid not to be used to pay for £500 an hour lawyers.

They have a huge house so i`m sure they can sell that and downsize and use that money to pay for their own legal costs.
 
Was reading in one of the papers today the fund set up to find the kid will be allowed to fund the defence case of the mccans,people donated so the money would be used in the hunt to find the kid not to be used to pay for £500 an hour lawyers.

They have a huge house so i`m sure they can sell that and downsize and use that money to pay for their own legal costs.
What paper?
 
New York’s Daily News reported on Saturday: Mommy Is The Suspect — Stunning Twist As Police Link Parents To Death Of Missing Vacation Tot

Columnist Andrea Peyser of the New York Post asked: “What took so long?”

She wrote: “What parent with functioning brain cells leaves toddlers alone?”
What person with functioning brain cells thinks that no one would leave a toddler alone. Seriously people need to lose the idea that their perception of the world is THE world.
 
What person with functioning brain cells thinks that no one would leave a toddler alone. Seriously people need to lose the idea that their perception of the world is THE world.

well it depends what you're doing,

at night the toddler will likely be asleep in another room etc,

but if you're going out for a couple of drinks at a pub you get a babysitter even if the pub is only 100 yards down the road, no?
 
The six directors controlling Madeleine's Fund will meet within the next 24 hours to discuss whether to release the money if the McCanns are charged.

Hmm...what's to decide? If they are shown to have been involved then the money was raised under false pretences and they have no right to its use. Oh I kept reading and see that the majority of the 'directors' are friends of the couple :/ That'll just be ******* ridiculous if they do get their hands on it.
 
I have a feeling it will not be long before some of the people who are closely associated with the "Find Maddie campaign" start to distance themselves from it.
 
Yes, not very impartial is it.

- Miss McVey, 39, a friend of Mrs McCann's since their student days
- Doug Skehan, 54, a clinical director of cardiology at Glenfield Hospital in Leicester and colleague of Mr McCann
- Peter Hubner, 64, a retired consultant and Philip Tomlinson, 76, a lawyer, both of whom are friends.
- John McCann, 48, Mr McCann's brother, and Mr Kennedy are also directors but Miss McVey said they would not be able to vote because they are family members.

So the six board members are...... one colleague, three friends and two family members.
 
but if you're going out for a couple of drinks at a pub you get a babysitter even if the pub is only 100 yards down the road, no?
I would, you would, but not everyone does...

And lol, the thought of using "Maddie"'s fund to defend themselves is not only ridiculous, but morally wrong.

It's just so funny, they apparently have all of a sudden given up in the search for their daughter, and are now wanting to use the fund set up to find her to protect themselves. It gets fishier by the day.
 
It makes my laugh all these so called news papers saying OUR source says this
OUR source says that, or another leading source said another.

why dont they just come clean and say WE DONT HAVE A CLUE SO WE MAKE UP A SOURCE

i deal in facts not rumor
 
It makes my laugh all these so called news papers saying OUR source says this
OUR source says that, or another leading source said another.

why dont they just come clean and say WE DONT HAVE A CLUE SO WE MAKE UP A SOURCE

i deal in facts not rumor

Informants don't take kindly to having their names published :rolleyes:
 
Parents child dies (either intentionally or accidentally)
Parents hide child in church
Parents raise money "to find her"
Parents get accused of murder
Parents have enough money to get themselves very good lawyers.


It definately isn't right, although i don't know if those are the way events unfolded (like everyone else in this thread i'm just speculating) they would seem like a very logical prosession should 2 people panic and want to raise money for lawyers.

I said something was weird from day one, i guess i'll have to wait a bit longer before i know for shure.
 
Yes, not very impartial is it.

- Miss McVey, 39, a friend of Mrs McCann's since their student days
- Doug Skehan, 54, a clinical director of cardiology at Glenfield Hospital in Leicester and colleague of Mr McCann
- Peter Hubner, 64, a retired consultant and Philip Tomlinson, 76, a lawyer, both of whom are friends.
- John McCann, 48, Mr McCann's brother, and Mr Kennedy are also directors but Miss McVey said they would not be able to vote because they are family members.

So the six board members are...... one colleague, three friends and two family members.

Esther McVey, ex TV presenter and want to be MP. Now does the word oppurtunism spring to mind?
 
i don't think the board will allow the funds to be used for these lawyer fees. even if you are 100% behind the mc canns (which of course they are), they must know that it's morally wrong to use the money for this purpose. this is not what people gave their money for. they gave it to help find a little girl.

and what about the the backlash they'd get..... i just don't think it will happen.

i've got my humble pie on a slow bake today. :D
 
Last edited:
Was reading in one of the papers today the fund set up to find the kid will be allowed to fund the defence case of the mccans,people donated so the money would be used in the hunt to find the kid not to be used to pay for £500 an hour lawyers.

:rolleyes:Wondered how long it would take for them to dip into that. Only the other day they said that they "Would definitely not be using the fund for any legal costs"
 
Reports say they are swingers, that Mrs McCann is pretty hot, would you?

These reports of a clump of hair in the boot, if they went to that much trouble to hide the body for 20 odd days then dump it again, you would have thought they would have cleaned and checked the boot out.
 
LEtting them use the money or not is a tuff call for whoever decides. If they ARE Innocent, which I don't believe for a minute, but if they are then they should be able to use the money.

But if they are guilty it makes it absolutely wrong in a million different ways for them to use it.

Personally I hope they can't use it.
 
If they ARE Innocent, which I don't believe for a minute, but if they are then they should be able to use the money.

Why exactly?

That money was donated to help find a little girl, nothing else. I can't see anyone donating money thinking "I've made a difference, the McCanns can now afford top-notch legal representation!".
 
Back
Top Bottom