I don't understand why people keep recommending this board for oveclocking quads.
1. It has TERRIBLE Vdroop/drop or whatever it's called. I set a Vcore of 1.585 in the bios and under load it drops to 1.47!!
2. The PWM design/cooling is very poor. Any decent clocks and the PWM temps soar to the hight 80's. A fan over the PWM is a must for any decent overclocking.
I wish I had gotten the P5K premium or the DQ6 now tbh.
1. It has TERRIBLE Vdroop/drop or whatever it's called. I set a Vcore of 1.585 in the bios and under load it drops to 1.47!!
2. The PWM design/cooling is very poor. Any decent clocks and the PWM temps soar to the hight 80's. A fan over the PWM is a must for any decent overclocking.
I wish I had gotten the P5K premium or the DQ6 now tbh.


Would give me my 4000Mhz default on the ram. How accurate is the Cpu-z vcore? I take it that's the one to watch taking vdroop/vdrop into consideration. Both cpu-z and uGuru show the same vcore, it's only the bios that is out. I wouldn't want to kill my new baby lol
What's considered safe vcore (as read by cpu-z if indeed that is the more accurate method?). I am sure for 3.6Ghz I would add 2/3c to my average temps. Not sure how much vcore I would need to add, I seem to be adding a lot more to gain stability for very little at this end of the o'clock.