Soldato
- Joined
- 28 Nov 2004
- Posts
- 16,024
- Location
- 9th Inner Circle
Cyclists should have to pass some road safety test at least.
What about horse riders? Or pedestrians?
Cyclists should have to pass some road safety test at least.
Horse riders too. Pedestrians shouldn't be in the road now, should they?What about horse riders? Or pedestrians?
Can't have been that empty if mr plod was around...
Telescopi hit the nail on the head. "Another crime solved".
Good to see them cracking down on the real issues.
Pedestrians shouldn't be in the road now, should they?
Yet driving at 40mph in a 40mph zone puts no lives at risk? I don't see your logic.Breaking the speed limit puts peoples lives at risk the same CANNOT really be said for riding on the pavement!!
Ah really unlucky, but it is your own fault in two ways.
1. You broke the law
2. You got caught![]()
Get off your high horse
I bet you have broken the speed limit before?? That's breaking the law!
Breaking the speed limit puts peoples lives at risk the same CANNOT really be said for riding on the pavement!!
I know its illegal in Deutschland, not sure about here.yes and no, if pedestrians cross the road and there's a pedestrian crossing nearby. I'm pretty sure police can charge them with something.
If you don't feel safe on/in your vehicle, either you need to choose another type of vehicle or become a pedestrian but don't take your vehicle onto the footpath!
Good about time cyclists realised they have to obey road laws.
TBH £30 on the odd occasion you get caught seems to be a reasonable price for a vastly reduced chance of being involved in a fatal road accident.
riding on the pavement certainly does endangers people lifes. It doesn't take much to seriously injure toddlers and old people.
I know its illegal in Deutschland, not sure about here.
In the same way as if you did 31mph in a 30mph zone and they put you in front of a magistrate. You'd accept you'd broken the law but you would think "hang on this is a bit over kill no?"
Erm, More likley to have a fatal accident on a busy road than I am on a pavement? Not that this is the point..
Hello allllec,
A couple of weeks ago I was riding on the pavement and got stopped by a couple of police officers. I could say I was asking for it because I was ridding right pass a police station and their was a police van parked right next to it with about 5 police officers in it.Though, luckily I didn't get a fine because I said I didn't have a excuse when they asked me and just admitted that I was in the wrong.
I can completely see where you are coming from about ridding on busy roads and I too will also ride on the pavement instead of the road if it's busy. If I am ridding on the pavement, I won't be ridding like a idiot and will happily get of my bike if theirs anyone just about to walk past me
I think fines should be more based on how you are ridding a bike on the pavement and not simply, your on the pavement - fine!!! If your ridding on the pavement, going as fast as you can and basically knocking pedestrians over then you should be fined, no doubt about that. However, if your simply ridding slowly, you are happy to get of your bike when pedestrians are near by or there's a corner up ahead and basically not acting like a complete mentalistthen I honestly don't see the problem.
Hello singist, that's not very fair though in my opinion. Cycling is a great way to get to places, it keeps you fit to a certain extent and is also a great way to save money and I don't think cyclists should be effectively penalised because they don't feel safe ridding on the road with machines right behind them that could potentially kill you in seconds. There needs to be more lessons geared towards cyclists about ridding on the road and to follow the Highway Code, their should also equally be lessons towards drivers to be more aware of cyclists and too respect them as well.![]()