• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

** The Official ATI RV770/RV700 Series Review/Overclocking Thread **

Updated my CryMark results, found the hotfix so I installed that, and disabled some pointless features in CCC.

780/1090:

Run #1- DX9 1680x1050 AA=No AA, 32 bit test, Quality: High ~~ Overall Average FPS: 45.205
Run #2- DX9 1680x1050 AA=2x, 32 bit test, Quality: High ~~ Overall Average FPS: 37.47
Run #3- DX9 1680x1050 AA=4x, 32 bit test, Quality: High ~~ Overall Average FPS: 28.815
Run #4- DX9 1680x1050 AA=8x, 32 bit test, Quality: High ~~ Overall Average FPS: 37.41
Run #5- DX9 1680x1050 AA=8xQ, 32 bit test, Quality: High ~~ Overall Average FPS: 21.495
Run #6- DX9 1680x1050 AA=16x, 32 bit test, Quality: High ~~ Overall Average FPS: 37.51
Run #7- DX9 1680x1050 AA=16xQ, 32 bit test, Quality: High ~~ Overall Average FPS: 37.54
 
Skyboat said:
Updated my CryMark results, found the hotfix so I installed that, and disabled some pointless features in CCC.

780/1090:

Run #1- DX9 1680x1050 AA=No AA, 32 bit test, Quality: High ~~ Overall Average FPS: 45.205
Run #2- DX9 1680x1050 AA=2x, 32 bit test, Quality: High ~~ Overall Average FPS: 37.47
Run #3- DX9 1680x1050 AA=4x, 32 bit test, Quality: High ~~ Overall Average FPS: 28.815
Run #4- DX9 1680x1050 AA=8x, 32 bit test, Quality: High ~~ Overall Average FPS: 37.41
Run #5- DX9 1680x1050 AA=8xQ, 32 bit test, Quality: High ~~ Overall Average FPS: 21.495
Run #6- DX9 1680x1050 AA=16x, 32 bit test, Quality: High ~~ Overall Average FPS: 37.51
Run #7- DX9 1680x1050 AA=16xQ, 32 bit test, Quality: High ~~ Overall Average FPS: 37.54
Click to expand...

Both times your score seemed to go up going from 4xAA to 8xAA... thats rather odd, unless I am reading something incorrectly.
 
good stuff ehh

59575007me4.png
 
ffallic said:
Both times your score seemed to go up going from 4xAA to 8xAA... thats rather odd, unless I am reading something incorrectly.
Click to expand...

I sat quietly waiting for someone to pick that up, I assume the benchmark thinks nobody would seriously ever want to run 8Xaa in Crysis.....or could just be the game does for some reason not support it !
 
Skyboat said:
780/1090:

Run #1- DX9 1680x1050 AA=No AA, 32 bit test, Quality: High ~~ Overall Average FPS: 45.205
Run #2- DX9 1680x1050 AA=2x, 32 bit test, Quality: High ~~ Overall Average FPS: 37.47
Run #3- DX9 1680x1050 AA=4x, 32 bit test, Quality: High ~~ Overall Average FPS: 28.815
Run #4- DX9 1680x1050 AA=8x, 32 bit test, Quality: High ~~ Overall Average FPS: 37.41
Run #5- DX9 1680x1050 AA=8xQ, 32 bit test, Quality: High ~~ Overall Average FPS: 21.495
Run #6- DX9 1680x1050 AA=16x, 32 bit test, Quality: High ~~ Overall Average FPS: 37.51
Run #7- DX9 1680x1050 AA=16xQ, 32 bit test, Quality: High ~~ Overall Average FPS: 37.54
Click to expand...


Some very strange results there, 28FPS with 4XAA but 37 FPS with 16XAA?????? thats insane!!
 
JAKUS said:
I sat quietly waiting for someone to pick that up, I assume the benchmark thinks nobody would seriously ever want to run 8Xaa in Crysis.....or could just be the game does for some reason not support it !
Click to expand...

Seems to be defaulting back to 2xAA. Must be broken - Crysis that is. Well, I guess that goes without saying :)

Could you do me a favour - don't know if you have the full game and perhaps a save on the first ice level, but if so, would you load it up with 1680x1050 all high with 4xAA and tell me what FPS you are getting, more or less?
 
Loowi_ashley said:
Some very strange results there, 28FPS with 4XAA but 37 FPS with 16XAA?????? thats insane!!
Click to expand...

Aye I thought that too, but was getting similar results before I installed the hotfix and played around with the drivers. Really not sure what's going on with Crapsis and ATI hardware tbh :p

Interestingly, ignoring the anomalies that are 4x and 8xQ AA, there is literally no hit from 2x->16x.
 
Last edited:
They come with a better Cooler than that Standard !
Simple little Mod for the time being would be connect the 4 pin cable to with a homemade adapter to a motherboard fan header or direct to the power with a resistor or Fan controller, until full fan control is available through the bios

Not knocking Your efforts for 1 minute.....but would say You should have trimmed down that Ram sink ;)

Bottom line is as long as Your happy :)
 
Well I've just ordered a 4870 for 179 with delivery :)

Going from an 8800GTX, so not expecting to be blown away but it should be a nice increase as I've just got a 24" monitor as well
 
straxusii said:
Just swapped my heavily overclocked 8800GT for a 4870, initial results below (4870 at stock at the moment)

World in conflict (very high@1920x1200 av/min/max)
8800GT 21/10/41
4870 41/23/78

Vantage
8800GT p5545 h3492 x2143
4870 p7992 h5341 x3593


The ATI auto tune sets it to 780/1090 so I'll post again with o/c results later
Click to expand...

780/1090 crashed in vantage, trying a more conservative 780/1050 gets me P8249

3dmark06 gets me 10083 at 1920x1200 4xAA, 16xAF
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom