Soldato
- Joined
- 11 Aug 2006
- Posts
- 5,319
- Location
- Pembs, Wales
I get that you believe that its just pretty much for homebrew stuff, but I dont get where your "Nope" comes from? regardless of what its used for the software\OS has been altered.. That's a no no, in any book!
There's a copy of Photoshop floating around the web with an alternative name. Its photoshop, but all the security has been stripped out. Everything else has been left intact. Do you think that's legal??
The Nope - To remove the protection in a Virgin Box is solely for one purpose and that is to defraud Virgin whereas Gehots CFW solely allows the running of homemade software nothing else if someone alters that CFW (undoubtedly they will) to run "backups" then your argument is valid BUT at the moment your comparison is not accurate therefore no argument (at the moment).

In actual fact I don't think he has stripped any security out of the firmware he has merely added the instruction to allow other software (correct me if I am wrong on this).
Last edited: