Computer or ps3?

Well you will have to move the mouse back to the original posistion eventually or you'll run out of mouse mat. Clearly this isnt going to be resolved because everyone has differant opinions.

To OP ps3 is exactly what a 12 year old should have its cheaper to replace if you break it and your friends have them. In this case its not always best to have the bragging rights of an amazing PC.
 
Well you will have to move the mouse back to the original posistion eventually or you'll run out of mouse mat.

You return it when you want to change look direction again, so that's never a problem, ie 1cm forward to look up and then when you want to return to centre of screen 1cm down. It's literally half the work to change viewing angle as compared to a stick, without the danger of overshooting.
 
I know this is a stupid question on here and you can be a bit biased but what should I choose. I'm the only pc gamer in my whole entire secondary school and none of my friends pc game but most of my friends have a ps3

Just get them all - I just have a gaming PC, PS3 and Xbox 360 plugged into the same monitor.

Then you can be immune to fanboys and just play whichever takes your fancy.
 
I'm sorry but some of you are saying I'm a terrible computer user well I have you know the I'm very experienced and most people who live around me ask for my help and I've been in the internals of many computers.
 
1.1k has been shown to EASILY buy you both.....i don't see the issue. the ps3 can sit next to the pc on your desk and hook up to the same monitor. no problems.

but if you're going the PC route


WELCOME. we meet wednesdays for coffee and cake. don't forget to bring some cookies.
 
If doesn't matter if you have a decent internet connection if the person hosting the game has a crap connection, or they quit and the game is delayed while the host is changed and the map resets. I personally have never found the analogue stick to be anywhere near as precise.

it depends on your definition of "better" however.

if "better" means more effective then its hard to argue, keyboard and mouse allows you to be hugely precise and turn on a 6pence in a split second. No chance of that with a pad.

BUT

my personal definition of better is more enjoyable, and that is a tougher call.
if you play at a desk, keyboard and mouse is fine, however, if you like to game relaxing on the sofa in front of the telly with a beer and some mates as i do, then a control pad is better.

try playing split screen gears of war or halo on the sofa with 2 of you useing a keyboard/mouse.

(also keyboard and mouse is almost tantamount to cheating in a way, a pad sort of puts back some of the limitations of physics, you CANT turnround and headshot someone from 200 yards with a pistol when using a pad like you can with a keyboard/mouse set up.

so as i said, i think it depends on how you like to game, as after all, for most, gaming is about entertainment, not necessarily the most "efficient" system.
 
Don't waste your money on a PS3. Consoles are dumbed down for the masses hence they don't have RTS.


way to go on the elitist comments!. :(

consoles are not that good at RTS due to limitations of the control pad (alhough i believe you can use keyboard and mouse on ps3) but it is not because they are dumbed down.

you should thank the success of the consoles, if it wasnt for that pc gaming would be in even more of a mess as generally most games are not profitable on the pc as a standalone platform.
 
PC's are superior technology wise....

However PC's lack 1 major thing.... Gran Turismo 5!!!!!!!!!!!!

Yep, it has iRacing instead ;)

This is quite a funny thread.

"Get a PS3, they are teh awesome"
"No get a PC, they are teh awesomer"

Helpful.

With £1100, easily get both. Problem solved.
 
way to go on the elitist comments!. :(

consoles are not that good at RTS due to limitations of the control pad (alhough i believe you can use keyboard and mouse on ps3) but it is not because they are dumbed down.

you should thank the success of the consoles, if it wasnt for that pc gaming would be in even more of a mess as generally most games are not profitable on the pc as a standalone platform.

Well, he's right (though I wouldn't put it that bluntly), consoles are dumbed down. How many people do you know who quite happily state they are useless with computers or say 'I don't care how they work as long as they do' or something similar. Consoles fit a vast segment of people who couldn't care less about how things work, they just want it here and now.
 
i would suggest wanting something which you stick a disk in and it just works is not dumbed down, not having to download the latest drivers etc to cover up incompatible hardware, or having to benchmark your game and decide what effects to turn off to have it run properly. .

(I am not suggesting consoles are better than pcs, just that it is not a bad thing to be the kind of person who just wants to play a game and know it will work fully optimised for your hardware without mucking around)

PC's have their strengths, but so do consoles and i do not think intelligence comes in to it. (I am happily the owner of both a pc and a console)
 
To be honest if you'd have posted this in consoles, you have probably ended up with a PS3. Forum is bias depending on where you post.

For instance, in here someone said theres more variation on PC than console. Well thats bull. As its pretty much an even playing field with regards to variety.

Anyways, Enjoy the PC. I'd have gone the PS3 way, but then again I'm not a fan of the keyboard and mouse approach to gaming. Hurts my back after a few hours
 
you should thank the success of the consoles, if it wasnt for that pc gaming would be in even more of a mess as generally most games are not profitable on the pc as a standalone platform.

other way round bud :)

without pc gaming console gaming probably wouldnt excist

n thats true for all platforms tbh..

thing is take COD for example, used to be a brilliant game
till consoles dumbed it down for console masses hence its new name Clone Of Duty... same game diferent textures mw1 mw2 blops... all exactly the same bar textures
 
console gaming was around looong before pc gaming

call of duty is in a generic rut at the moment, i agree but why do you not think that would have happened anyway? That is kind of the problem with all entertainment media at the moment.

piracy is so so rife on the pc at the moment - i dunno if you read the interview with crytec after crysis on the pc but i remember they said that that would be the last pc exclusive they worked on due to the %age of people who just copied it.

things have kind of gone a full circle imo, we started off with games consoles and gaming computers, then in the 90's the PC had their heyday (starting with the likes of wing commander imo) basically because they were so so much more powerful than the consoles amd gaming computers like the ST/Amiga of the time.

the PS1 arrived which frankly embarrassed expensive PC hardware, but was hit back with the likes of the 3dfx voodoo a year or so later and pcs got their crown back.

PC's now are STILL more powerful than consoles, however the gap is fairly small after it all comes out of the wash (after taking into account a bloated OS and backwards compatibility & an infinite number of hardware configs holding the pc back)

but imo until piracy is stemmed on the pc, i do not think you will see many pc exclusives unless they are pay monthy games like iracing or WOW.
 
Last edited:
You must be mad, £300 and it doesn't even have an amplifier! You could get a Denon Amplifier and ~600W speakers for a little more than that.

Yes I am mad. I have serious mental problems but you're still wrong.

The amplifier is built into the sub, as are the Creative 5.1 and 7.1 sound systems. The Edifier is the best speaker system sold by OCUK.

I would have expected better from a fellow social anxiety sufferer.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom