So it seems.
Whether Osama Bin Laden was armed personally or not doesn't specifically decide the threat level of an operation.
(As an example)
His house could be rigged to blow and he has a small detonator with him, is that what you mean?
Shall we have a whip round and buy arknor a dictionary?







(Edit: 60 odd page now!)
Just needed to rant after seeing a pathetic argument on the same subject on "Young Voters question time", David Starkey being arrogant as ever