Caporegime
- Joined
- 18 Oct 2002
- Posts
- 33,188
He was a trouble maker in the dressing room and caused enough rifts....sure he was a good goal scorer but getting rid of him was for the best of the team....replacing him with Ibra for the amount they paid was beyond stupidity though but it goes to show how desperate Barca were to get rid of Eto.
I don't think he's much of a trouble maker, the "trouble" he caused was YEARS before when he hated Ronaldinho, and the club rather backed Ronaldinho, for a year, before he got lazy, not very good, drank to much and ended up leaving. Eto'o felt rather let down by being dropped frequently during those times and wanted to leave because they picked Ronaldinho over him, when Ronaldinho left Eto'o had probably his best season ever at Barca, but he wanted out.
Frankly I think the Ibra fee was for two reasons neither having anything to do with how much they wanted to get rid of Eto'o, they wanted to APPEAR to be buying someone better, AND they wanted to match Real in spending, as they'd just chucked circa 200mil on players, but 80 mil on Ronaldo, which is just about where Eto'o+ Ibra deal ended up being worth.
Basically the price was for show, saving face, and trying to make out like they were upgrading rather than being forced to sell their best player.
Ibra had 16 goals in 23 starts in the league, 4 in 9 starts in the champs league, and about the same goals/game ratio as in Italy. But for 80mil they wanted 30 goals in 30 starts, because they are idiots.
They should have stuck with Ibra and recognised Messi as the new main goal scorer..... (Highlander accent) "their can be only one" .
They should stick with Villa, buying Rossi is just taking the pee.