sorry but i disagree with your post. If fabregas is trying to help arsenal get good money from him, why isnt barcelona coughing up the 40m? 2 years ago fabregas was worth around 30m. today his being sold same amount? by your logic, fabregas HASNT helped us not one bit. hasnt helped us win any silverware for the last 2 years and hasnt helped arsenal gain more funds from him.
If he wanted to go 2 years ago we could have sold him to barcelona for the SAME price we are now offering him to barca now. so what have we gained from him signing 6 year contract? No trophies, no proper fee for him.
try and use just a little bit of logic, firstly, the numbers being talked about are 35mil with another 5-6mil depending on Barca's performance, which means, 40mil total and we're very likely to get that. So you're understating the fee by a large amount, its no where near the Nasri fee, and the Nasri fee is hyperinflated due to City being morons, nothing more or less, any other club in the world bidding for Nasri today would be bidding 10 as an absolute maximum.
Then look at the other things, Cesc is epic for Arsenal, in the previous two seasons he has been the difference between winning and not more than any other player in the team, he's been worth countless points, and we might have dropped outside the top 4 without him which would have cost us upwards of 40mil in the past two seasons. If he hadn't signed a contract, he could be leaving this summer for nothing, instead, he's likely leaving for 40mil, if you can't see the difference between that, I really can't add anything.
Killswitch sums up what most Arsenal fans feel, 7mil upfront on a player who likely won't play more than a handful of games for 2 years, but won't stump up 2-3mil extra to actually get the CB we need in.
Considering the club is FULL of striker/wingers already, even if AOC(too long typing out his name, he'll be AOC from now on, yes, this took longer, this time

) is fantastic, he'll be one of far too many players we have for the same position. We waste money on all these expensive potential youngsters, which frankly if we had 10 less youths on the book, and just bought AOC in 4 years as almost the finished product for 15mil, would have saved millions.
Hell, lets say AOC is great in, 4 years time, but is on 2mil a year until then, he'll have cost us 15mil minimum before he makes any difference for us anyway, so whats the point.
WE don't need AOC today, or in the next two years, we desparately need a CB, today, and we need to stop wasting money on Squillaci, who is really rivaling Grimandi for the worst player to play at CB award for us.
ANyway the latest press news is, Fabregas has been asked to stay in the UK till Sunday at least...... sounds to me like Wenger tried to pretend he wasn't leaving until after the Newcastle game, as if the players don't know he's going anyway, nor the fans, no one is unaware he's off. Whole thing is a joke, we're reduced to trying to delay bad news till after a game incase it hurts us, even though everyone knows its coming.
IF Barca had offered 40mil for Vermaelen and we were desparately trying to keep it quite till next week, maybe, but Fabregas, the cat's been out the bag for 4 years.