Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Personally I'd go with the 570, for the better driver support
Save yourself some money and get a 6950 2GB mate, not a lot of performance difference between the 6970 and 6950.
570 is a viable option but less VRAM if that concerns you?
Take a look at those benchmarks btw, you have 5850's in Xfire more powerful than a single 6970.
As for a 6950 or 560 he has it in his budget to go a little higher than these and with more demanding games such as BF3 now out i though he may aswell go a little higher.
Absolute nonsense!:
![]()
http://www.google.co.uk/search?aq=f&gcx=c&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8&q=nvidia+driver+problems
![]()
http://www.google.co.uk/search?aq=0...ourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8&q=ati+driver+problems
As above get a 2GB 560/6950(there's nothing in it really) and save the cash, they are both very overclockable!
Although I generally advise people to stick with what they know, in your case ATI.
But 6950 stocks are drying up, which probably means it's replacement is about 4 weeks away. It might not be the high end ATI cards that are coming out but the midrange cards will probably be performing at 6970 speeds for less cash.
As above your current crossfire setup will outperform a single card most of the time anyway.
Just like this one means nothing:Sorry but that google search means nothing...
for the better driver support
Specs are:
Battlefield 3 AMD Crossfire Performance
Full Caspian 64 Player Map
Ultra Settings
In game fps using console command:
'Render.DrawFps 1 Boolean'
Amd 6950>70 Crossfire @ 880MHz/1350Mhz
Catalyst 11.10 preview2 + Cap3 Win7
2500K@ 4.5GHz
MSI Z68A-GD55-G3
16GB Corsair Vengeance Red 1866 Mhz
128GB Crucial M4-Windows
120GB Corsair Force 3-BF3
Windows Pagefile is disabled(I don't know if this helps with the stuttering but I've never had any)
I don't care for AMD/Nvidia, they sure as hell don't care for us, they just want our cash.
I used to be like you, I've been using computers from the ZX81 days onwards(I'm getting old in the tooth now) and up until my 7800GT Sli's every card I owned was from Nvidia whether they were better or not!
Now it's been 3 series of AMD cards purely for BBFB or out 6 months earlier!
If the 2GB's 560's were out at the same time as my 6950's and they didn't have the unlocking ability and I didn't already have a £40 cooler from my 5870, I would have bought them for the Physx!
Out of owning 3 ATI cards I honestly can't say they are any better/worse than Nvidia, they both have their faults, it's plain to see if you browse through the forums.
All the major OEM's use both companies along with Intel and others, if AMD were even remotely as bad as you say they are they wouldn't touch AMD with a bargepole, they would just use Nvidia!
Still not wearing it!
'I see a hell of a lot more problems with Nvidia.
All my friends that have had problems have been because of Nvidia.
I have no doubt that some people will have had probs with ATI.
But again, I see people complaining about Nvidia drivers a hell of a lot more than I do ATI.'
It could be so easy to write that too.
It just so hapens that both driver comments comes from Nvidia owners!
If Nvidia bring out a cheaper card than AMD at my pricepoint the next time I upgrade, that's what I'l buy!
All this their 'drivers are rubbish' etc. is total nonsense, as quoted above, if they were remotely as bad as some people in here say they are, NO ONE would buy them!
Do you honestly think Samsung, Sony, Acer, HP, etc would be using ATI cards with all the so called problems?
I very much doubt it.
From MY experiences and MY opinion, ATI are worse.