This guy is using a 570 on full ultra (full that is) I have lost track of what this thread is about but this guy can clearly play BF3 MP (most taxing) with a very good frame rate.
That's not good enough for Andy, he needs more proof.
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
This guy is using a 570 on full ultra (full that is) I have lost track of what this thread is about but this guy can clearly play BF3 MP (most taxing) with a very good frame rate.
This guy is using a 570 on full ultra (full that is) I have lost track of what this thread is about but this guy can clearly play BF3 MP (most taxing) with a very good frame rate.
That's not good enough for Andy, he needs more proof.
This guy is using a 570 on full ultra (full that is) I have lost track of what this thread is about but this guy can clearly play BF3 MP (most taxing) with a very good frame rate.
The latest BF3 patch was released after the thread was posted.I mentioned earlier in the thread that later patches stop the crash.
Yeah, and no mention of BF3.
Ed. And if you are too slow to work out why disabling the paging file makes your PC faster then you shouldn't be posting on internet forums.
I can completely agree, i,ve had my page file disabled for a couple of years now since having to do it to get Saints Row 2, 90% playable due to some helpful advice and it being a bad port, and my whole system has been quicker and more stable since.
Greg. If I say something to you for the hundredth time will you actually listen and let it sink in?
What you see in FPS when caching from the hard drive counts for nothing. It is simply how fast the image is moving on the screen.
I've tried to explain this to you over and over again, but you just don't seem to get it. Why? is it because you feel that I am trying to upset you by targeting Nvidia.
It's getting quite late now, and I am getting tired. So, I will explain this for you one last time in the hope that it may finally sink in.
Just because you see an amount of FPS on a screen does not equate back to a smooth play experience. Tommy posted a graph last night that explained it, explained lags and delays.
FPS are counted on your screen. They do not depict the time it takes your mouse and keyboard presses to relay into the screen and onto the game.
If I have to explain one more time that I would never have sold my GTX 470 if it could run BF3 smoothly I am going to bloody puke.
I sold it because what FRAPS said in the top corner of my screen counted for crap. It was laggy, and trying to aim load and fire the sniper rifle was being hurt by the texture caches from my hard drive. This in turn led to me dying, a lot. Enough to annoy me enough to want to do something about it.
If you can't grasp that? then I'm sorry mate, because I just can't explain it any more.
lmao yep.
Also this thread was interesting from awhile back.
http://forums.overclockers.co.uk/showthread.php?t=18333705
Yeah but that movie has like nothing to do with this thread. This thread is about turning off the paging file to see if BF3 will crash as it runs out of vram. That video just some random guy on a 570 playing bf3 at god knows what resolution![]()
But this thread was never about that. It was about displaying how 1gb and 1.2gb vram is not enough for BF3 and possibly? the future, and how it most certainly uses your paging file to cache textures.
And if you still don't get it then I feel very sorry for you.
Yeah but that movie has like nothing to do with this thread. This thread is about turning off the paging file to see if BF3 will crash as it runs out of vram. That video just some random guy on a 570 playing bf3 at god knows what resolution![]()
Do you realise that the proof has been coming along to back up exactly what I say?
Yet all I have had out of you all day is crap. You started bringing physical memory into the mix (way to not read the OP and miss the point, BTW) and then I post you two pictures of memory usage and explain to you what the OP was about and you shut up?
Don't you find that odd? Don't you also find it odd that all of the evidence posted from people who actually bothered to input constructively in this thread instead of waffling hot air all backs up what I have said?
Do me a favour Greg. Go and find another thread to argue over the 680 and 7970. Because quite frankly mate you're bloody crap at this one. You clearly do not understand what it is you are arguing about.
Maybe one day when you do it will finally sink in.
What you see in FPS when caching from the hard drive counts for nothing. It is simply how fast the image is moving on the screen.
I've tried to explain this to you over and over again, but you just don't seem to get it. Why? is it because you feel that I am trying to upset you by targeting Nvidia.
It's getting quite late now, and I am getting tired. So, I will explain this for you one last time in the hope that it may finally sink in.
Just because you see an amount of FPS on a screen does not equate back to a smooth play experience. Tommy posted a graph last night that explained it, explained lags and delays.
FPS are counted on your screen. They do not depict the time it takes your mouse and keyboard presses to relay into the screen and onto the game.
If I have to explain one more time that I would never have sold my GTX 470 if it could run BF3 smoothly I am going to bloody puke.
I sold it because what FRAPS said in the top corner of my screen counted for crap. It was laggy, and trying to aim load and fire the sniper rifle was being hurt by the texture caches from my hard drive. This in turn led to me dying, a lot. Enough to annoy me enough to want to do something about it.
If you can't grasp that? then I'm sorry mate, because I just can't explain it any more.
As I said in my previous post, the latest patch was released after the thread here was made:I mentioned earlier in the thread that later patches stop the crash.
Here we go again with the school lessons. Mr Kruga asked about a 570...I gave him a vid showing how it copes and not that constant drivel you dish out saying 1GB is not enough.
I have told you time and time again but your ignorance is beyond comprehension.
You insult me by calling me mush. Infact if people don't agree they are all ignorant according to you.
I am sick and tired of your constant lies because many gamers here quite happily play BF3 with a 1GB card or am I lieing? You need help maybe?
As I said in my previous post, the latest patch was released after the thread here was made:
http://forums.guru3d.com/showthread.php?t=360411
He has 1GB VRAM and is running without a pagefile BEFORE the patch that fixed the crashing was released. And he has no problems..
So it's a Purchase Justification Syndrome after all?
Riveting tale, chap.
Or, are you like Greg? forget all about what was said yesterday and start each day a fresh posting the same old rubbish?
Weird, I thought that was you.