President Obama Endorses Gay Marriage

No one's quantified the good things the Catholic Church has done yet, or should we just accept it as read?

Have you head of Google?

Why don't you answer the question and provide some examples of how homosexuals have done good things on the scale of the Catholic church?

To be honest there have been plenty of Anti-Catholic threads already.

It's going a bit off tangent.
 
Isn't using sexuality as an identifier to 'the good things people have done' a bit silly?

Let's provide some examples of the good things straight people have done. Let's provide some examples of the good things black people have done. Let's provide some examples of the good things women have done.

Sounds silly now.

It's about the person or organisation. Sexuality isn't really an organisation or defines someone no more than being black etc.

Hm I am sounding really 'pro gay marriage, pro gay' by now . As I've stated I am quite indifferent but like to have a reasonable and logical thought process. Be objective.
 
We all sin - do I hate everyone?
I sin - do I hate myself?

Two of my best friends are a couple living together out of wedlock. I think they are sinning by doing this. Do I hate them?

You seem to be far more obsessed with hate than anyone else.

You also seem to have a strange view of the world. Do you actually know any gay people? If you do is what they do in the bedroom "what they stand for"? Is it what you stand for? That is a pretty strange view on the world.

You are judging people by their actions, claiming you don't hate them just what they do, which is just asinine.

Yes I do know some gay people and they stand for gay rights and being seen as equal under the eyes of the law, they are also proud of being gay and feel no shame in undertaking homosexual sexual activity.

The implication from your posts is that gay people should hate who they are and suppress all the feelings they have. A gay person is OK with you so long as they don't act on any of their desires or even think about gay sex (a mind crime).

As I said, you are trying to justify your homophobia.
 
Let's provide some examples of the good things straight people have done. Let's provide some examples of the good things black people have done. Let's provide some examples of the good things women have done.

These things can be listed, why are you afraid to list what good deed homosexuality have done?
 
A church is not a business not subjected to the same laws.

I wouldn't support for example, people being forced to allow gay couples to stay in their houses against their will (The B&B incident excluded as that was a business).

Now whether the Church should be considered a 'business' is another matter but that would also involve them having to accept women Bishops (which wouldn't be a bad thing) but also force them accept Muslims as vicars too.

what about black people? what about ginger people? would you allow people to refuse them too?
 
Why don't you answer the question and provide some examples of how homosexuals have done good things on the scale of the Catholic church?

If you read my posts, I've clearly stated that they are essentially neutral purely on the basis of scale of both the good and bad aspects of the Catholic Church.

I'm fairly sure not doing bad things is in the middle of the good/bad scale, so anything not being detrimental to anything is the starting point of good.

Why do homosexuals need to achieve positive things before they are allowed stuff, surely not doing bad things is a perfectly acceptable starting point.
 
You are judging people by their actions, claiming you don't hate them just what they do, which is just asinine.

Yes I do know some gay people and they stand for gay rights and being seen as equal under the eyes of the law, they are also proud of being gay and feel no shame in undertaking homosexual sexual activity.

The implication from your posts is that gay people should hate who they are and suppress all the feelings they have. A gay person is OK with you so long as they don't act on any of their desires or even think about gay sex (a mind crime).

As I said, you are trying to justify your homophobia.

Yawn - yet more racism from you.

A gay person is OK with me no matter what they do.
 
What good acts have homosexuals committed that are greater than the good acts carried out by the Catholic Church?

As we are talking about bad actions carried out in the name of the Catholic Church I think it is only fair for you to list the good actions carried out in the name of homosexuality.

well, plenty of musicians, artists, comedians, authors.

whereas the catholic church brought us organised paedophilia and hypocrisy and tried to ban contraception while an AIDS epidemic was on. plus plenty of murder.
<burns>splendid</burns>
 
what about black people? what about ginger people? would you allow people to refuse them too?

I would support the right of a racist to not let black people into his home. I would wholly disagree with his views and argue against them but I would defend his rights to hold them and act on the in his private property.

Businesses do not have this right however I would not support any discrimination there. I was against the B&B owners for that very reason.

You cannot force or legislate people into thinking a certain way and trying to only creates more resentment.
 
well, plenty of musicians, artists, comedians, authors.

whereas the catholic church brought us organised paedophilia and hypocrisy and tried to ban contraception while an AIDS epidemic was on. plus plenty of murder.
<burns>splendid</burns>

You know the majority of Clerical Paedophiles are homosexual don't you?

Anyway - the Catholic Church gave us Da Vinci and Botticelli - the homosexuals gave us "Glee"

I rest my case. I am actually sick in bed at the moment (as I said earlier)

;)
 
No one said they did. But as usual you say a lot but provide nothing.

All I said was that all the bad things the Catholic Church have done are worse than all the bad things that homosexuals have done. Net contribution wasn't mentioned.
 
These things can be listed, why are you afraid to list what good deed homosexuality have done?

I don't think anyone does good things because they are 'straight' or 'gay'. Usually because they are a good person, regardless of sexuality.

Do people do good deeds in the name of hetrosexuality? :confused:

There are many gay people who have done good things in various ways. Some famous, some not so famous.

The catholic church advocates itself as the catholic church and a force. I am not aware that gays do things "in the name of the gays" outside of gay rights? I think they just want equality and then that's the end of it? Would there ever be "the gay RSPCA" or "homeless children's charity, by the gays"?
 
Two of my best friends are a couple living together out of wedlock. I think they are sinning by doing this. Do I hate them?

This is what I find weird and hypocritical about certain religious people.

Sin is bad. People shouldn't sin. Thus you shouldn't associate yourself with sinners. Much like I wouldn't be friends with a thief, murderer or general A-hole.

Many religious people who conveniently overlook the more socially acceptable sins, such as the living out of wedlock, blasphemy or sex before marriage. Sure if you had strength in your convictions, you wouldn't associate with sinners, unless you are actively trying to street them on to "the right path".
 
I have read the Koran, the Talmud, the Torah, the Vedas and many other religious books. Ignorance is not a strong position to criticise from.

Haven't read the whole thread but totally agree with your previous post. Ignorance is not an excuse.

Was marriage even related to religion a couple of centuries ago?
Marriage is a biblical concept and is an institution established by God - the bible makes that perfectly clear. Simply looking at the relationship between God and Israel is the easiest example – also Christ and the Church.

I wasn't alive a couple of centuries ago. Yes it was still a church ceremony but I do often wonder how people thought about it.
Same way that funerals have Christian sayings but it is not often thought of as a religious ceremony.
I think you're getting confused between religion/tradition and culture. Culture adopt elements of religion/tradition and is absolutely the case of a typical church-based wedding ceremony having bible readings whether or not those getting married are of that religion or not.
The point is, just because something like a wedding or funeral includes a bible verse doesn't mean the bible lays out the format, it's purely an interpretation of the institution through culture/tradition.

Saying that you have hit the nail on the head a bit – non-Christians having a church based wedding always makes me wonder why, if they have no belief, do they have a church based wedding? Obviously apart from the buildings typically being nice service venues etc. Don't get me wrong, I think it's good to get married in a church, just interesting thought.

I was brought up methodist and their churches have very specific formats of services from weddings, funerals and dedications (or christenings as some call them) - this is wholly down to culture/tradition but generally structured around the biblical concept of marriage.

Wedding rings, big ceremonies and the signing of a piece of paper is just our cultural, traditional and legal take on it but under the umbrella of a religious ceremony.

Back to (sort of) the point - the bible makes it absolutely clear that the act of homosexuality is an 'abomination' (Lev 18:22). My question to those wanting gay marriage legalised is:

- why would you want to be a part of an institution (marriage) that is based on Judeo-Christian teaching that clearly condemns the act of homosexuality?

Also, whilst on the point, I think it is absolutely wrong for any minister to be forced to perform gay marriages.

Back on topic - God made Adam and Eve, not Adam and Steve

Flame suit donned
 
Back
Top Bottom