Why are you confusing not wanting a player with accepting a huge bid, I honestly don't get it.
He's left all doors wide open there, and it is the smart move, says everything right should he stay, but also lets City know he's basically coming if they get a bid accepted.
Do you ever expect him to say I left for City because they tripled my wages and have very realistic chances of winning at home and in Europe?
In an era where players are criticised routinely for having far too much power, poor old Daniel Agger is made to feel unloved and forced out of the club he's so loyal to because they (potentially) accepted a massive bid for him. Really??
I'm not trying to be critical of Agger, he's done nothing wrong here, I just don't think Liverpool will be doing wrong either if they eventually cave. If we consider Berbatov to be the biggest example of badly treating a player (and I do think our treatment of him has been very disgraceful) Agger and Liverpool doesn't even slightly register anywhere on the same scale. It's simply another case of a club wanting to hold on to a player, but eventually the money on offer became too much. The desire to keep the player doesn't usually change, the ability to say no to the money is more often than not what gives.
.
