I am completely for abolishing the silly Sunday trading laws.
I want to be able to go to Tesco at 1AM on a Sunday to buy a cucumber and a HDMI cable (don't ask) - problem? I'm not in any way saying that we should force the stores to open all day, I'm just saying I want them to have the option to do so.
The main arguments against abolishing it are pretty nonsensical too:
Allow smaller shops to compete
If we want to help the smaller shops compete, then why don't we get rid of the small shops which have prospered, achieved economies of scale which benefit the consumer, grown and then prospered as etailers or supermarkets too? If a shop fails to modernise with the times, then it's their problem - not mine. So what if your local corner shop that tries to rip me off by charging £1.05 for a Dr. Pepper (yes - you heard me; £0.05 more than tesco! Thieving *****!


) has been forced to close down because people realised that the awesome supermarket is so much better?
Protect workers' rights
I can totally see where you're coming from with this point, and it would most certainly be a valid one were it not for the AMAZING laws of this epic country to protect our rights and sanity.
SOURCE FOR THE FOLLOWING QUOTES
Employers can’t force adults to work more than 48 hours a week on average - normally averaged over 17 weeks.
I'm going to just use simple calculations for the purposes of this argument - please don't be overly pedantic!
48 hours over 7 days means roughly 7 hours a day. That really isn't a lot. Really, it isn't. Some people prefer to work 7 hours a day for 7 days and have time on the weekdays, others prefer to work 10 hours a day for 5 days and have weekends off - both are perfectly acceptable and 100% reasonable.
That's utter tripe and you know it. If a potential employee won't agree to working sunday in retail they'll just find someone else who will and you won't get the job.
Workers 18 or over who want to work more than 48 hours a week, can choose to opt out of the 48-hour limit.
This could be for a certain period or indefinitely. It must be voluntary and in writing. It can’t be contained in an agreement with the whole workforce.
An employer shouldn’t sack or unfairly treat a worker (eg refused promotion) for refusing to sign an opt-out.
It's true in EVERY job that the employee that is willing to do more to benefit the company will pretty much be guaranteed to get the job over the employee who isn't. I see no problems at all with this. If I'm prepared to work harder than someone else, why should I not be rewarded for it?
Employees are also within their rights to not want to work more than 48 hours a week and the law protects them from being punished as a direct result of this. They can't be forced in any way to work more than those 48 hours. If they are dismissed and the only reason is that they wouldn't sign an opt out, then they have every right to sue the employer.
TL;DR: UK = awesome, employee rights are protected.