snip
I have explained this in the post above, and it needs no repeating. The associations are the point I was making, that I did not list them all or treat each one individually is irrelevant as I explained above. And it isn't about one OR the other, but about the associations....for example:
A kid beats his mate comprehensively in a computer game (or any game or competition) and he expressed three things, one that he beat him, the other his dominance over him, and also that he humiliated him in doing so, he does this by using the term "You've been Raped" casually.
To each kid it doesn't mean anything other than one kid got one up on his mate.....however the associations are still there with the formal use of the word Rape...they being the use of power and humiliation to express themselves over another often in a belligerant or violent way (depending on the game, activity or context of course), I think a better term, and I should have possibly used it initially is one of dominance....which is indicative both in the way the gamer/competitor is expressing himself and is also indicative in Rape itself.... it is also about the culture of sexism and promulgating it through casual usage of the terms.
To cut it short, it is the casual use of the term Rape that is the issue, not the intent itself. The articles I referenced explain this more fully.
And besides Your counter of an alternative meaning doesn't impact it's associations and why people have concerns over its casual use, as it is obvious that they are using it in a different context and therefore its meaning is different, but it is how we associate the word that is what people are concerned about and that is the point I seem unable to get across to you.
Last edited: