He was out on loan. That loan spell has now ended.
Hopefully the team we loaned him to, will buy him off us.
He was out on loan. That loan spell has now ended.
The fact Hulk is incredibly overrated and really not that good would be the reason why I would think.
19.5m for Navas + 3.5m in clauses is the rumor and all that is needed is the official announcement.
Also the only problem with Isco is wages, Graham Hunter saying we either sort it out or he us going to Real.
The fact Hulk is incredibly overrated and really not that good would be the reason why I would think.
19.5m for Navas + 3.5m in clauses is the rumor and all that is needed is the official announcement.
Also the only problem with Isco is wages, Graham Hunter saying we either sort it out or he us going to Real.
Well as I have said I can't believe that he was our only target and us signing him must mean our other targets just weren't available.Navas is a very strange signing. A club like Man City should be aiming higher you'd think.
Navas is a very strange signing. A club like Man City should be aiming higher you'd think.
It's funny because we actually got fined more from UEFA for that chant than they did for being racist to Balotelli. Lol.
Navas is a very strange signing. A club like Man City should be aiming higher you'd think.
I'm sure Arsenal fans were thinking the same when they signed Cazorla, IIRC people were dismissing him before he ventured to the Prem, now I'm sure he'd get into any of the top sides.
I'm sure Arsenal fans were thinking the same when they signed Cazorla, IIRC people were dismissing him before he ventured to the Prem, now I'm sure he'd get into any of the top sides.
The fact Hulk is incredibly overrated and really not that good would be the reason why I would think.
19.5m for Navas + 3.5m in clauses is the rumor and all that is needed is the official announcement.
Also the only problem with Isco is wages, Graham Hunter saying we either sort it out or he us going to Real.
I haven't seen enough of Navas to compare but I just don't rate Hulk.Hulk is much better than Navas though, and will move for money which is the main thing that City has over other clubs.
I wonder what's going on behind the scenes at City now, because they're seemingly not willing to throw cash at big money transfers anymore... Are the Arabs getting bored?
Mancini tried for three years to bring in Lavezzi, Sanchez and Hazard and we failed every time. Finally we brought in Sinclair!
So either our management team don't have a clue about football and only know of a limited set of players or every time we go in for one of the best wingers we get rejected so they have just decided going for Navas is our only option.
Eh??? thought we had got rid of that muppet once and for all...if not please Wenger make it your top priority to sell Santos or hell give him away for free please
Well at least Denilson and Squillaci, both terrible players have finally been given the boot. Some more clearing out to do though, Diaby, Gervinho, Chamakh, Rosicky and Sagna are a few that need to be shipped out this summer and get some decent replacements in.
I'm sure Arsenal fans were thinking the same when they signed Cazorla, IIRC people were dismissing him before he ventured to the Prem, now I'm sure he'd get into any of the top sides.
Hopefully the team we loaned him to, will buy him off us.
It is not always right to wait though because then the summer drags on and we end up buying someone like Sinclair for the sake of it.The only thing you can take from that is, if you don't get players you want, DO NOT just go out and buy any player because they are available, because thats how you end up with players who aren't good enough on huge wages sucking the money out of clubs. IF who you want isn't available, wait and find someone you do want, don't just look on a list of wingers and buy the first one available, its asking for trouble and the worst possible way to run a club.
Navas at his best, comfortable at a club he's at, isn't the best winger around by a LONG shot, he's not terrible, he's not great, and he shouldn't be the first choice for a prem club looking to go for a title. You shouldn't buy players for the short term, just because..... Go find 5 young players who are 16-19 who show potential and buy them, and if in next 3 years they don't progress, get more youngsters on the cheap, and if over that time someone like Ronaldo becomes available, buy someone actually top notch. However I absolutely don't for even a second believe Navas is the "only" winger available.