I believe it was the initial impact into the water that they think may have caused the 'event'?
That would make more sense. But I can't recall this ever being discussed with the Air France disaster?
I believe it was the initial impact into the water that they think may have caused the 'event'?
Iraq missions also flew from U-tapao. And the two guys were Iranian, so by your logic they would be happy with Diego Garcia helping to defeat Iraq.
At this stage I'm open to anything more likely than alien abduction.![]()
I believe it was the initial impact into the water that they think may have caused the 'event'?
?
I find that hard to believe.
Who knows that to believe with all of this
I don't think we can start to doubt the laws of physics yet![]()
So I've just been catching up on today's news. Seems like a bit of progress maybe:
[Early on this morning]
The shutdown of two communication systems happened separately, which presumably means it was done so deliberately and not a catastrophic failure. The data reporting system, they believe, was shut down at 1:07 a.m. The transponder -- which transmits location and altitude -- shut down at 1:21 a.m.
The ACARS system that the airline use only transmits over VHF radio. They have not paid for the satellite subscription. So if it's out of radio range, then no data. The aircraft does however have SATCOM equipment fitted (just that ACARS can't use it).
The US are saying that the engine communications system kept 'pinging' for 4 hours, every 30mins, after the aircraft is meant to have disappeared. No data was transmitted, but the plane was sending the keep-alive signal like mobile phones do. So the aircraft can't have been completely destroyed. The US aren't saying what their source of this intelligence is (assuming it's either Spy satellites listening in to every signal on earth or they've raided the logs of Inmarsat/Iridium/Thuraya).
[Later this morning]
Military radar says it followed a proper flightpath (using known waypoints) heading towards the Andaman Islands.
On the seismic detection angle, the US certainly has the capability and have done for decades to hear that sort of thing underwater as they've been able to triangulate where Russian subs have sunk in the past and then try to recover them to reverse engineer any technology.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GSF_Explorer
It's an amazing story.
Yep, this whole area around the South China Sea is pretty much within the 'ring of fire' they'll have some pretty impressive seismometers around there. Certainly possible that they would notice 250tonnes of metal hitting the seabed.
It doesn't illustrate anything if the comment of fuses behind a communication board was a load of ****.
Anyway I will let people get back to googling crap articles written by journalists scouring pprune and bow out. I have to work tonight and as much as I hate working with aircraft I hate talking about them even more in my free time
If I get any Comms and Nav issues tonight I will be sure to come to ocuk for system resets.
Yep, this whole area around the South China Sea is pretty much within the 'ring of fire' they'll have some pretty impressive seismometers around there. Certainly possible that they would notice 250tonnes of metal hitting the seabed.
Just read on Sky news app, satellites received signals upto 5 hours from last communication! Proper What The Fudge moment...
Leads me to think it was taken control by crew/hijackers and diverted to different location, by which time the authorities realised certain things we're turned off and maybe they shot the thing down. Anyone's guess now.
Yep, this whole area around the South China Sea is pretty much within the 'ring of fire' they'll have some pretty impressive seismometers around there. Certainly possible that they would notice 250tonnes of metal hitting the seabed.