How is that a fair comparison really? What were the respective prices back then? What metrics are you using to compare usability?
If someone came to me with a 9yr old laptop, i'd have to question their ability to gauge speed, performance and expections of laptops etc. Also, question their ability to let go of the miser-within!
Price wise they were more or less the same £30 difference, mac being the higher.
Performance is easy, the PowerPC was made obsolete (remember it was obsolete when it was well under 9 years old). And the old PowerPC graphics chipset was no match for Intel.
Also note it's not my main laptop, it's kept as a spare/media player, the screen is pretty much only matched or bettered by £800+ laptops today, and the 1280 x 800 res over the 1366 x 768 standard is preferred .

Tbf there are no fair comparisons between Macs and PCs, as Apple have such a limited range. In these discussion it tend to be the PC that has to match the apple extremely limited line up and when they can't apple win by default? :/
In reality both will have positive and negative points.

