Project cars benchmarks

whyscotty · 13 May 2015 at 21:16

Final8y said:
Well as some users have said that it was working fine before on AMD than NV gets involved and then its not, just like Crysis 2 was fine in beta then NV gets involved than CF was broken on release.

Nvidia bad

Funny thing is though, you really believe this crap that you come out with.

UTmaniac · 13 May 2015 at 21:16

I finally installed Windows 10 preview earlier and it is a revelation to pCARS performance on my old rig!

Final8y · 13 May 2015 at 21:22

whyscotty said:
Nvidia bad

Funny thing is though, you really believe this crap that you come out with.

Funny thing is everything i have said is backed up by events, i cant help it if you did not know about them.

JediFragger · 13 May 2015 at 21:26

Gregster said:
I got Dying light on release and it runs really well for me as well.

In reality, I feel that AMD have maybe cut critical jobs to save cash and the lack of game support is really starting to show (as seen with Project Cars). I hope they can turn it around mind and get back to good support for new releases. Maybe they didn't think PCars would be so popular but reading around, it has a massive fan base.

I think I agree, I never had such Crossfire problems (at least with my 290's) since around late Autumn last year (the same kind of timeframe that PCars say they got shunned regarding AMD sitting at the table). Cuts have been harsh and deep, AMD are certainly feeling it in all critical areas.

I just hope that they're making the right decisions...

Gregster · 13 May 2015 at 21:29

whyscotty said:
Nvidia bad

Yer, best to say that and be done with it.

Twirlywoos · 13 May 2015 at 21:41

3D Vision Screenshots pulled from the game. I've had a look at the gallery and they look amazing.

https://forums.geforce.com/default/.../project-cars-3d-vision/post/4526144/#4526144

Gregster definitely give this a try

Digital X · 13 May 2015 at 21:46

@UTmaniac, what was the fps before and after if you know please? Was it a huge upgrade in performance?

JediFragger · 13 May 2015 at 22:10

digitalx said:
@UTManiac, what was the fps before and after if you know please? Was it a huge upgrade in performance?

I gather it's a 15-20% improvement

triss · 13 May 2015 at 22:34

I hope nvidia never go under i'm not sure who else some users would blame otherwise for AMD's issues at times, The dev stated they AMD had not been in touch , is that nvidia's or intels or Apples fault... . Really end of the day its AMD's, doesnt make them a terrible company just means they dropped the ball on it for some reason and i'm sure there working on it now and all will be good in the world

UTmaniac · 13 May 2015 at 22:39

digitalx said:
@UTManiac, what was the fps before and after if you know please? Was it a huge upgrade in performance?

In Windows 8.1*, I was getting ~30fps at the start at Spa when alone in thunderstorm, In Windows 10 I get ~40fps.

In Windows 8.1, away from Spa's pitlane building I typically get ~45fps, in Windows 10 ~60fps.

Basically, I'm getting the performance of Windows 8.1 in the dry with Windows 10 in the wet.

* With the modded Windows 10 driver, with official Windows 8.1 drivers I would get ~20-25fps.

Digital X · 13 May 2015 at 22:40

Nice. I tried a thunderstorm on everything max at 1080p (because 4k is lolnope atm with just my card on Pcars) got around 30 ish.

layte · 13 May 2015 at 23:15

Final8y said:
Seeing as the developers is known for his heavy bias against ATI/AMD since Need for speed shift and you dont know what transpired and what was said then it means absolutely nothing and carries as much weight as NV saying that the reached out to offer physx to AMD but AMD was not interested when you have no idea of the terms.

lol

(I thought for a few minutes on the best reply to that post, in the end I think I came up with a suitable retort.)

Tonester0011 · 14 May 2015 at 02:17

whyscotty said:
Nvidia bad

I agree. I'll like to add, AMD good :rolleyes:

Final8y · 14 May 2015 at 06:25

layte said:
lol

(I thought for a few minutes on the best reply to that post, in the end I think I came up with a suitable retort.)

That's because you have you cant refute what i said, but you think you must say something for the sake of saying something, when the best you could have said that you disagree due to a difference of opinion.

whyscotty · 14 May 2015 at 07:31

Final8y said:
Funny thing is everything i have said is backed up by events, i cant help it if you did not know about them.

I know one thing - As and when AMD fail at something the blame always seems to fall at Nvidia's feet.

Final8y · 14 May 2015 at 07:47

whyscotty said:
I know one thing - As and when AMD fail at something the blame always seems to fall at Nvidia's feet.

I disagree, i dont think NV are always to blame when AMD fail at something.

layte · 14 May 2015 at 08:11

Final8y said:
That's because you have you cant refute what i said, but you think you must say something for the sake of saying something, when the best you could have said that you disagree due to a difference of opinion.

No. It's because it's a bunch of conspiracy theory tinfoil hat nonsense that has been given the response it deserves.

The developer has categorically stated that AMD failed to contact them once in the past six months, yet you still absolve them of blame and generate a narrative in your head to paint AMD as the plucky underdog. Beset upon by Nvidia and their legion of developer henchmen.

Final8y · 14 May 2015 at 08:58

layte said:
No. It's because it's a bunch of conspiracy theory tinfoil hat nonsense that has been given the response it deserves.

The developer has categorically stated that AMD failed to contact them once in the past six months, yet you still absolve them of blame and generate a narrative in your head to paint AMD as the plucky underdog. Beset upon by Nvidia and their legion of developer henchmen.

They are not theory they are facts of which has happened with regarded to shift 1&2 both NV sponsored titles, history is repeating itself and i has said you dont know what was asked and why AMD stopped replying to them so in this case you have nothing but theory, so yes you have nothing, when you have more than he said she said from one side then you have something.

whyscotty · 14 May 2015 at 09:08

So WHAT actual facts do you have that history is repeating?

layte · 14 May 2015 at 09:13

So you don't actually have any facts at all to counter what the game developers have to say. im basing what I say on hard fact, your counter is based on things you are telling yourself to make you feel better.