Possible Radeon 390X / 390 and 380X Spec / Benchmark (do not hotlink images!!!!!!)

Ayahuasca · 3 Jun 2015 at 12:25

Aurhinius said:
Okay those not doing compute on their gpu do not need more than 4gb of vram. Fact.

lol

Geeman1979 · 3 Jun 2015 at 12:25

gerico said:
You seem like a bit of a ****. The guy is just doing his job, which is working for AMD so yes he is going to be backing the company paying his wages.

And you seem like a whiny *****.

Life goes on.

eyetrip · 3 Jun 2015 at 12:26

Aurhinius said:
Okay those not doing compute on their gpu do not need more than 4gb of vram. Fact. So 4gb of memory isnt a problem.

Get real...

Boomstick777 · 3 Jun 2015 at 12:26

Nvidia:

TheRealDeal · 3 Jun 2015 at 12:26

Gregster said:
I took the mickey when Roy posted a tweet saying look at how good the APU was against all the others... But it was the wrong way round and it was one of those "lower is better" ones and he didn't realise the APU had the biggest line

Gregster · 3 Jun 2015 at 12:27

Ayahuasca said:
lol

He said "Fact", so must be true.

Also I got a 2 week suspension for typing **** at someone (I actually pressed the star key 4 times and didn't type any swear words at all)

Geeman1979 · 3 Jun 2015 at 12:29

Gregster said:
He said "Fact", so must be true.

Also I got a 2 week suspension for typing **** at someone (I actually pressed the star key 4 times)

You rebel you

Aurhinius · 3 Jun 2015 at 12:30

eyetrip said:
Get real...

Happy to be proven wrong then. Can you show any benchmark that shows a 4gb card produces a lower fps that is statistically significant against an identical card with more than 4gb?

pmc25 · 3 Jun 2015 at 12:34

TheRealDeal said:
What did you say to get blocked?

Presumably spewing FUD as he does on here.

Minstadave · 3 Jun 2015 at 12:36

Aurhinius said:
Happy to be proven wrong then. Can you show any benchmark that shows a 4gb card produces a lower fps that is statistically significant against an identical card with more than 4gb?

WTF?

Aurhinius · 3 Jun 2015 at 12:36

Gregster said:
He said "Fact", so must be true.

Also I got a 2 week suspension for typing **** at someone (I actually pressed the star key 4 times and didn't type any swear words at all)

Sorry perhaps shouldnt have used the word fact but no need to get childish or sarcastic. As posted happy to be proven wrong. Wasnt trying to stirr up things but i do feel there is a wide misconception that 4gb of vram isnt enough and i think as current things stand it is enough even for 4k.

Ayahuasca · 3 Jun 2015 at 12:36

pmc25 said:
Presumably spewing FUD as he does on here.

That's what you've done with this post.

He's explained above that he corrected Roy and it looks like he threw his toys out the pram and blocked him for it.

Minstadave · 3 Jun 2015 at 12:37

pmc25 said:
Presumably spewing FUD as he does on here.

He's a lot better than he used to be! I still remember his anti-mantle rage

pmc25 · 3 Jun 2015 at 12:38

Boomstick777 said:
This is more like it ! Others have picked up this. Go AMD !!

Rooting for the underdog !

If it has 4096 GCN cores at 1Ghz or above it will 100% be the fastest single GPU card by a large margin ... by how much we don't know.

The 4096 / 1Ghz has been the only consistent rumour since the beginning (November / December last year).

slick rick · 3 Jun 2015 at 12:38

Aurhinius said:
Sorry perhaps shouldnt have used the word fact but no need to get childish or sarcastic. As posted happy to be proven wrong. Wasnt trying to stirr up things but i do feel there is a wide misconception that 4gb of vram isnt enough and i think as current things stand it is enough even for 4k.

With games like Dying Light, GTA V and SoM more VRam is deffo better at 4k IMO.

ubersonic · 3 Jun 2015 at 12:38

Boomstick777 said:
Nvidia:

I must break you

Click to expand...

Nvidia talking to their cards ahead of launching a new AMD beating driver?

pmc25 · 3 Jun 2015 at 12:39

Minstadave said:
He's a lot better than he used to be! I still remember his anti-mantle rage

He's now posted a bait thread about how DX12 is somehow NVIDIA's trump card ... despite most of it being Mantle ..

Jono8 · 3 Jun 2015 at 12:39

Final8y said:
Its still a fact whether you think it matters or not.
AMD had the 8GB DDR5 card out 7 months before all the NV consumer cards.

I think you are missing the point people are trying to make (which is a very valid one). If this is a Titan X beating, behemoth of a card that people will be buying for 1440p and 4k gaming, 4GB is a pretty stingy amount of vram to have on the standard reference card.

pmc25 · 3 Jun 2015 at 12:41

Ayahuasca said:
That's what you've done with this post.

He's explained above that he corrected Roy and it looks like he threw his toys out the pram and blocked him for it.

Given the nature of most of his posts, you think that was the only thing he tweeted?

Gregster · 3 Jun 2015 at 12:41

Aurhinius said:
Sorry perhaps shouldnt have used the word fact but no need to get childish or sarcastic. As posted happy to be proven wrong. Wasnt trying to stirr up things but i do feel there is a wide misconception that 4gb of vram isnt enough and i think as current things stand it is enough even for 4k.

Lol no problem and it made me chuckle was all. I also didn't mean to be rude but running 1080 even on GTA V with everything maxed uses over 4GB and 1440P is close to 6GB. 1440P on COD:AW I couldn't run max settings on the 290X and textures were all muddy looking but on the Titan (original) I was getting really high frames (60+ always) and had the VRAM to cope. There is other games as well but I have been on 4am starts, so brain is a little mashed.

pmc25 said:
Given the nature of most of his posts, you think that was the only thing he tweeted?

Well I wasn't blocked till I took the mickey in that tweet I mentioned but you can think what you like, I don't really care and it is just a GPU forum lol Much more important things to worry about.