There is a huge difference between 2 sovereign nations agreeing a give-and-take deal and 1 country having to accept the will of 26 others as part of being a club they can't easily get out of though.
That's not how the EU works.
There is a huge difference between 2 sovereign nations agreeing a give-and-take deal and 1 country having to accept the will of 26 others as part of being a club they can't easily get out of though.
What proportion of EU exports come to the UK? What proportion of UK exports go to the EU?
Latest from Project Fear: Vote Leave and you'll starve
In the extremely unlikely event of Spain deciding to screw over its own farmers and putting food sanctions on the UK, we'll just buy our food from somewhere else - like France, USA, Canada...
What proportion of EU exports come to the UK? What proportion of UK exports go to the EU?
Heh? That actually puts UK in a weaker position imo. As it is UK imports about 50% of food. Spain or whoever might just say we'll stop selling you food and your people go hungry soon enough.
Surely the more self sufficient you are the stronger your position is.
So what if our foods a bit more expensive, it's a price I'm willing to pay to slow down the incessant immigration.
Furthermore, you basically claim that trade will continue as now just because it's sensible financially... but the finances are one consideration. Eg. why would the EU give the UK all the benefits of the EU without any of the obligations? Eg. a contribution to its budget/accepting free movement of people/etc? If they did, what would stop other countries following the UK out of the door? Why would France and Germany want to stay in the EU if they could 'do a UK' and leave whilst retaining all the benefits?
https://www.uktradeinfo.com/Statistics/OverseasTradeStatistics/Pages/EU_and_Non-EU_Data.aspx
And you're being selective with your figures. I'll help you by posting the one you're avoiding mentioning,
I think looking at the cash value of imports and exports is less important than the proportion, given the big difference between the size of the UK economy and the collective rEU economy. Is that unfair? Why?
Furthermore, you basically claim that trade will continue as now just because it's sensible financially... but the finances are one consideration. Eg. why would the EU give the UK all the benefits of the EU without any of the obligations? Eg. a contribution to its budget/accepting free movement of people/etc? If they did, what would stop other countries following the UK out of the door? Why would France and Germany want to stay in the EU if they could 'do a UK' and leave whilst retaining all the benefits?
What about non-EU immigration which makes up about 50% of those coming into the UK? Most of the ghettos in the UK are made up of non-EU citizens, not Poles and Romanians.
It's gone from a lot to still loads. And weren't you wrong on the trade balance? Didn't you claim we're net exporters?
I'm not a politician, I don't have answers to everything, but leaving the EU would seriously reduce immigration in general, so that's why I'm out.
You're still ignoring the fact we export 44.6% of our stuff to the EU. Sure, we're important to them because they export 21% of their stuff to us (I'm using your figure and assuming it's right... maybe a mistake)... no one's pretending that we're not an important export market for the EU, but I'd argue we need them more than they need us.
All this talk of the UK being able to strong arm these negotiations when it comes to immigration and trade...
So are we all confident that our politicians will be able to secure all of the ideal agreements without compromise AND do it all within two years?
Even that is not for certain, it will likely just shift the proportion of where the migrants come from than actually heavily reduce it and thats IF we take a pretty extreme approach.
The UK outside the EU would represent 21% of all EU trade which is more than USA and Japan combined. The UK outside the EU would be the biggest market for the EU.
Don't use Dan Hannan's "statistics" - they've been debunked many times already. Do your own research.
And that's ignoring the political reality point I mentioned about how giving us a great deal would represent an existential threat the to EU.
It'd have the upper hand if we had equivalent sized economies, or if we weren't more reliant on them than they are reliant on us... but that's not the case. Put it this way... if there was suddenly no trade between the UK and EU, they'd have a 21% cut to their exports whilst we'd have a 44.6% cut to our exports.
And that's ignoring the political reality point I mentioned about how giving us a great deal would represent an existential threat the to EU.
I wasn't saying what impact tariffs would have, or that magically trade would stop. I was point out the relative importance of the trading relationship in a way other than looking at the deficit.
https://www.uktradeinfo.com/Statistics/OverseasTradeStatistics/Pages/EU_and_Non-EU_Data.aspx
And you're being selective with your figures. I'll help you by posting the one you're avoiding mentioning,
I think looking at the cash value of imports and exports is less important than the proportion, given the big difference between the size of the UK economy and the collective rEU economy. Is that unfair? Why?
Furthermore, you basically claim that trade will continue as now just because it's sensible financially... but the finances are one consideration. Eg. why would the EU give the UK all the benefits of the EU without any of the obligations? Eg. a contribution to its budget/accepting free movement of people/etc? If they did, what would stop other countries following the UK out of the door? Why would France and Germany want to stay in the EU if they could 'do a UK' and leave whilst retaining all the benefits?
It's gone from a lot to still loads. And weren't you wrong on the trade balance? Didn't you claim we're net exporters?