Associate
- Joined
- 10 Sep 2008
- Posts
- 368
Any time Gove speaks he just sounds more and more like this.

How anyone can think putting Labour back in control is a good thing is beyond me.
You need a conservative government to pay for a labour one and we haven't finished paying for the last labour government.
So Gove decided to go it alone, but I wonder why Johnson did not just stand regardless?
How anyone can think putting Labour back in control is a good thing is beyond me.
You need a conservative government to pay for a labour one and we haven't finished paying for the last labour government.
How anyone can think putting Labour back in control is a good thing is beyond me.
You need a conservative government to pay for a labour one and we haven't finished paying for the last labour government.
How anyone can think putting Labour back in control is a good thing is beyond me.
You need a conservative government to pay for a labour one and we haven't finished paying for the last labour government.
This is what I don't understand with Gove. The papers and parliment in general seem to think he did a good job, yet teachers and the like think he messed it up big style.A lot of Tory MPs believe he did a fantastic job in education..................
Wow watching that Theresa May statement... she seriously does not have this countries best interests at heart.
Wow watching that Theresa May statement... she seriously does not have this countries best interests at heart.
Scoff all you like chaps. You miss understood me.
Labour wasn't responsible for the crisis.
Labour are responsible for a bloated public sector with higher than average salaries to ensure votes. The public sector pension bill is crippling us.
It's why conservatives appear to actually borrow more - they have to pay off what Labour do to the country.
What utter rot. The average gold plated civil service pension is £4,750 per year.
What's she spouting?
Taking a very very authoritarian position over it - I might not have put it the best above - she was basically saying she'd be making a number of executive decisions whether people like it or not. It might technically be a good way for the country from a business perspective but little consideration for the people involved in the equation.
Source?
In a divided country I can't see what else she can do. If she panders to the loudest voices then she will achieve nothing.