You make it sound like he did it on purpose. One of the best drivers to have ever driven in F1 has done exactly the same thing.
Hulkenberg's one of the best defensive drivers currently in F1 and though I've not seen his interview I would be staggered if that wasn't sarcastic.
There's a whacking great big run off, including a dedicated diversion.
Villeneuve didn't do it on purpose and I didn't say he did, however it was still his fault. A car ahead of him was in the middle of the track, it didn't make any sudden changes of direction, he was approaching faster than normal which instantly tells the driver the car ahead is slower than normal. The immediate course of action is precaution, either move to a different line, prepare for a slower car to brake earlier and give yourself more time to react, he did none of those things and ended up in a big crash.
It was pretty similar to Alonso at, the same corner even? Alonso wasn't at all prepared for a slower car with a slower driver to not take the corner identically to himself. He got far too close and gave himself no space to react.
As for Verstappen andthe run off, yeah, a run off, with sleeping policemen which can damage the car. No car has to leave the track to make room for another one, ever.
Hulk wasn't being sarcastic, Rosberg and Alonso also said what Verstappen did wasn't over the line. People randomly out of no where decided that defending without the car behind alongside is not acceptable... when the guy behind misjudges the closing speed and is ill prepared for a perfectly legal defensive move. Kimi almost hit Verstappen because he made the move too late, he wasn't prepared for Verstappen to defend and he wasn't ready to switch his move to the other side, every other top driver wouldn't assume Verstappen wouldn't defend.
Kimi almost caused the accident, defending your position with one move is completely legal and good driving. Multiple drivers are saying so, only weird fans who have decided that if the guy behind pulls out(but doesn't get frankly close to alongside) the guy ahead can't defend.
Remember back to the Spain incident, absolutely no one at all anywhere suggested Rosberg didn't have the right to pull right to the same side Hamilton had started to go. The problem came because Hamilton got alongside and Rosberg continued to move to the edge of the track forcing Hamilton off. If Rosberg was ahead of Hamilton and kept going to the right, no problem. Incidentally Rosberg was deemed at fault for the incident and specifically it was stated that it was his fault not for moving across after Hamilton made a move, nor just getting close, but because Hamilton was alongside and Rosberg then didn't leave the space. Absolutely not one person said Rosberg moving right after Hamilton did was against the rules, dangerous driving, bad driving or a problem. Had Rosberg got to the edge of the track without Hamilton getting alongside(and this was an incident with a bigger than normal closing speed) then Hamilton would have had to switch left or brake and not one person brought this up as bad, it was only when Hamilton got alongside that Rosberg continuing to the edge of the track was considered blocking and against the rules.