Associate
As someone who owns shares in gambling firms, I thank you for your cash, it paid for parts of university.
exceptions being when they win against other gamblers such as via betting exchanges or when playing poker.
#MindControl #NLP #conspiracy
As someone who owns shares in gambling firms, I thank you for your cash, it paid for parts of university.
Why would a casino ban someone who has a load of their money?
What does 'have a load of their money' have to do with anything?
I've not said a casino bans people because they 'have a load of their money'.
You said they ban winners when they detect them... the opposite is true.
I miss quoted, chopped the relevant part.
No, some people fully appreciate they'll lose and do it for entertainment.
No, the profits (mostly but not exclusively*) come from people who lose, that subset does of course include idiots. Winners get often get banned when detected - exceptions being when they win against other gamblers such as via betting exchanges or when playing poker.
* a winning betfair gambler or poker player still contributes towards profits via commission or rake
Pay into your betting account by Paypal then it doesn't show as a gambling company on your statements.
You've not made use of the quote function at all.
My post is only on the previous page yet you've misquoted me twice and haven't been able to read it in context - below is what I posted:
When I'm talking about people winning and losing I'm not talking about a single hand or bet or a short session of hands, spins, bets, whatever... - I'm talking about people who actually win or lose overall. No a casino or bookie isn't usually going to ban you for winning a single hand or a single bet or being net positive through sheer luck over a short session, series of them.
There are very few bookies that will want winning gamblers - Pinnacle is perhaps one of the exceptions. Ditto to Casinos, if you try any form of play that gives you an edge over the house then you can often be banned when detected.
Please quote me properly and read things in context - the opposite, as you stated, is generally not true. No Casino wants a player that has an edge over them.
You didn't talk about getting an edge over the casino. You talked about a "winner" not a cheater.
Winners, are very much allowed. Even over long periods of time. As long as its without engineering an edge over the house. Winning over a long period of time may trigger further investigation.
Generally winners don't exist without an edge - exceptions perhaps being outlier events like someone winning an accumulator bet or slot machine jackpot or perhaps someone who has only recently started gambling.
So, what you are saying, is if someone is winning over several thousand spins/bets, a casino/bookie will ban that person?
if the casino/bookie has completed their due diligence and found the player is not cheating, they would cease the business relationship and remove all chance of regaining that persons winnings?