Jail gays and lesbians and or remove their right to vote
Only the male gays right?
otherwise my collection of late night video watching might take a hit.
Jail gays and lesbians and or remove their right to vote
That wasn't for PR it was for AV. Totally different.We had a referendum six years ago on changing FPTP - the people voted to keep it. Like it or not it's here to stay.
Doesn't matter - people voted to keep FPTP. If you wanted change you should have voted for it![]()
Jail women who get abortions
Jail gays and lesbians and or remove their right to vote
Ban catholics from breathing
How would electoral reform help? The parliament would still be hung, and that's the problem.
And you can blame the electorate, they are the ones who deliver the results, not the parties. The problem is voters are dumb and don't think through the consequences of what they do, or whether what they are allegedly voting for is actually deliverable.
Regardless of whether you support labour, the conservatives, or another party, this outcome is bad for the UK and dramatically increases the chances of a bad Brexit deal.
Interesting to see the left leaning parties had more votes in total
Conservative - Votes - 13,650,900
Democratic Unionist Party - Votes- 292,316
UKIP - Votes - 593,852
Total - 14,537,068
Labour - Votes - 12,858,652
Scottish National Party - Votes - 977,569
Liberal Democrat - Votes - 2,367,048
Green Party - Votes - 524,604
Total - 16,727,873
We had a referendum six years ago on changing FPTP - the people voted to keep it. Like it or not it's here to stay.
Oh, the comments on Breitbart right now... the tears, the rage, the meltdowns, the agony...
It's just beautiful.
![]()
Doesn't matter - people voted to keep FPTP. If you wanted change you should have voted for it![]()
Doesn't matter - people voted to keep FPTP. If you wanted change you should have voted for it![]()
She is allowed to be an MP as well.
People don't want 'change', they want their vote to be equally weighted to anyone else'sDoesn't matter - people voted to keep FPTP. If you wanted change you should have voted for it![]()
Off the top of my head UKIP had 4m votes last time and 1 MP whereas the SNP had 2m and 50+, not that I'd want UKIP to have more MPs but that's just plain wrong.I think in the 2015 election if PR had been used, UKIP would have had something like 28 seats. I know this time they wouldn't but the benefits aren't always positive for PR.
i think corbyn would support good policies, however tories are going to offer zero good policies. I still think TM and tories will try and carry on as normall and in a few months realise its untenable and call another election.ignoring the childish antics for a moment, say the conservatives form a government and they try to move forward, how long will it be until labour start voting against everything the conservatives put forward not on the policies but just because they want to try and force a 2nd election while screwing up the country even more in the process. id expect a fair few voters would get annoyed if all they did was act in a way to try and derail the gov rather than trying to help get the uk get better.
and no im not saying they should support the conservatives on everything, but if theres good bills and they still block them because they can does that show them up for being out to just be in power rather than carry the country forward.
So why did they vote to keep FPTP?People don't want 'change', they want their vote to be equally weighted to anyone else's