Sticking by what I have been saying since the start, 1080 performance in dx 11 (possibly a bit faster) and leaving it behind in the dust where vulkan/dx 12 is concerned. And in todays market, no cheaper than £350, will probably release at £400.
-
Competitor rules
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Poll: ** The AMD VEGA Thread **
- Thread starter TNA
- Start date
- Status
Equivalent to two 1080ti's
Let's be optimistic
can I have some of those happy pills plz?
just a note I'm talking about release + a month if there's major driver issues to be fixed , not including *finewine* in these predictions guys
so basically the overclocked 1080 option?
Caporegime
- Joined
- 8 Jul 2003
- Posts
- 30,080
- Location
- In a house
Yes, with Vega at stock. If it's faster then great, slower than a 1080 and the green team will be in stitches.
Soldato
- Joined
- 25 Sep 2009
- Posts
- 10,290
- Location
- Billericay, UK
so come on people place your bets for rx vega
equal to GTX 1080
equal to GTX 1070
equal to GTX 1080 overclocked to 2.1ghz
equal to GTX 1080 overclocked to 2.1ghz
equal to 1080 ti
faster than all the above
my vote? 1080
I take it you mean games? Eventually faster then a 1080ti but out the gate slower then 1080 in DX11 and faster in DX12.
FP performance it's faster then a Titan Xp.
My view is that, AMD are working frantically to improve performance in drivers, and with the expectation they succeed they have come out with the "wait for RX drivers"
Why would they deliberately gimp gaming performance on this card? nvidia dont with titan.
So when RX launches I Do expect more performance but at the same time it wont be large, I think maybe 10%.
I am just been realistic.
Why would they deliberately gimp gaming performance on this card? nvidia dont with titan.
So when RX launches I Do expect more performance but at the same time it wont be large, I think maybe 10%.
I am just been realistic.
bits and chips have said that the value for performance is very impressive:
Take with a pinch of salt but they have a decent history of being correct....
Also, he said that he wouldn't be surprised if there was a nano too.
Caporegime
- Joined
- 8 Jul 2003
- Posts
- 30,080
- Location
- In a house
bits and chips have said that the value for performance is very impressive:
Take with a pinch of salt but they have a decent history of being correct....
Also, he said that he wouldn't be surprised if there was a nano too.
Could we be getting that £200 1070 afterall then
Permabanned
- Joined
- 12 Sep 2013
- Posts
- 9,221
- Location
- Knowhere
Caporegime
- Joined
- 18 Oct 2002
- Posts
- 31,200
DUN-DUN-DUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Permabanned
- Joined
- 12 Sep 2013
- Posts
- 9,221
- Location
- Knowhere
Caporegime
- Joined
- 18 Oct 2002
- Posts
- 31,200
Could we be getting that £200 1070 afterall then
Pffffffffft, £150 max (til the Manic Miners get ahold of 'em, then it's £600 baby!)
Permabanned
- Joined
- 12 Sep 2013
- Posts
- 9,221
- Location
- Knowhere
Careful, He may come back....
If the price is low, the number of unit available will be very low just so they can say they released it. They will use most of the chips for the high margin server cards. I would not be surprised if this is the case as why sell to gamers for cheap when you can sell to the server market and make good margins.bits and chips have said that the value for performance is very impressive:
Take with a pinch of salt but they have a decent history of being correct....
Also, he said that he wouldn't be surprised if there was a nano too.
It has to be cheaper than that. There is a very limited market for it for £500+ if it is only 1080 levels of performance.
- Status