Huuuur!
Too expensive!
Only idiots use them!
NO RIGHT CLICK!
It's not real unix!
Form over function!
Slave labour!
Hipster as ****!
Glad you agree

Huuuur!
Too expensive!
Only idiots use them!
NO RIGHT CLICK!
It's not real unix!
Form over function!
Slave labour!
Hipster as ****!
Everyone complains about apple making so much money and comment with 'i will never have a apple product's...in other news they say Amazon will become as big as apple and I bet 90% of people shop on Amazon![]()
Apple have always been form over function. Like I said, they are fashion items.
When your more than an end user, Macs are *****. You find out how badly made they really are. Including their OS.
The icing on the user preference cake is that it turns out there are solid business reasons to encourage staff to move to Mac. Not only has the company been saving between $264-$535 for each Mac deployment over four years, but just 3.5 percent of employees using a Mac will call the company help desk, he said. “Give employees the devices they want, manage those devices in a modern way, and drive self sufficiency in the environment,” Previn explains.
[...]
This is fully in line with experiences shared in 2015, when Previn said just 5 percent of IBM’s Mac users needed to call the help desk; In contrast, an astonishing 40 percent of PC staff request tech support help. At IBM last year just 25 staff supported 30,000 Macs.
Moving to Mac has also had a big impact on employee engagement at IBM, which climbed 10 percent year-on-year, with an employee survey attributing this freshened up enthusiasm to IBM’s provision of “better tools for IT”. The company reports a hugely impressive “91 percent user satisfaction” from its Mac users.
The longer this scheme runs the more compelling the business case becomes, he admits. “I can confidently say every Mac that we buy is making and saving IBM money,”
Apple have always been form over function. Like I said, they are fashion items.
When your more than an end user, Macs are *****. You find out how badly made they really are. Including their OS.
Everyone complains about apple making so much money and comment with 'i will never have a apple product's...in other news they say Amazon will become as big as apple and I bet 90% of people shop on Amazon![]()
I actually think android is easier to use
I don't have time to mess about managing music these days. Spotify does me fine.
The back button was one of the things which came to mind funnily enough. Find it hard work when using the Mrs iPad and I'm always asking how to I go back!! Guess it's what you get used to.
They should just have a swipe from left to right to go back, right to left to go forward and press the home button to go home.
.
The button on my Moto G6 Plus is set r to l go back, l to r all open apps and single press to home.
Actually over a large sample size it turns out they're way more cost effective - IBM bought tens of thousands of them and has the data to support that rather than anecdotes or some computer enthusiasts bitching about soldered parts or sharing a youtube video about cooling - in the real world, when looking at the costs, they're better:
https://www.computerworld.com/artic...-are-even-cheaper-to-run-than-it-thought.html
"but but but they're just "stylish" and overpriced... they're just bought by hipsters and girls" is a common anecdote
if we're going in for anecdotes I'll point out that some of the best technical people I've worked with in the past have been Mac users and insisted on being given a Mac as their work machine, I'm certainly not a fan boy I was happy with various Dell Latitude laptops for years
if you look at the likes of Facebook and Google the majority of their employees seem to be more than happy to elect to use Macs - but I guess all those Google engineers are hipster plebs who don't know anything
Yet almost no one uses a Mac based corporate network. They often trial it then realize it's just inferior to windows server or Linux.