^^^^^^
Looking good. You can do so much better with your memory though.
3600 is not stable, it crashed 10 minutes after that AIDA64 run, still made me laugh that I was even able to boot at that speed.
-
Competitor rules
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Ryzen "2" ?
- Thread starter beany_bot
- Start date
3600 is not stable, it crashed 10 minutes after that AIDA64 run, still made me laugh that I was even able to boot at that speed.
what sort of rendering or calculations are You doing ??
So far best Test Video I'w seen around
5ghz vs 4.3 1080p 1440p 4k in 11 games and 8 apps
Last edited:
Cross platform app development, a lot of programs running and regular compiling for Android / iOS / UWP / electron, etc.
Usefull then
Soldato
- Joined
- 1 Dec 2015
- Posts
- 18,512
thought id have some fun whilst i had an Aorus B450 board for a little period before it heads down south , will see if i can get a strix one.
awaiting thermal laser to check temps.
m 2700 chip is useless , can jus manage 4.1ghz with 1.44v and can take ram of 3633 hz ... so thought i'd load a tone of volts through 4ghz and see how the board fared as some reviwers slate (software temps) and some say its fine (thermal cams)
managed to test over an hour but daughter turned off the Pc (only 1) , so will try a record temps over 2 hour period , AIO being used to no direct VRM cooling bar good airflow .
takes about 2 mins to return to 40c for VRM
TMPIN4 is vrm
running stock
time for Ram... Ultra handled 3400 and Aorus 7 did 3633hz and x470 strix did 3600 ( 8 pack 4000hz) - again poor chip personally
awaiting thermal laser to check temps.
m 2700 chip is useless , can jus manage 4.1ghz with 1.44v and can take ram of 3633 hz ... so thought i'd load a tone of volts through 4ghz and see how the board fared as some reviwers slate (software temps) and some say its fine (thermal cams)
managed to test over an hour but daughter turned off the Pc (only 1) , so will try a record temps over 2 hour period , AIO being used to no direct VRM cooling bar good airflow .
takes about 2 mins to return to 40c for VRM
TMPIN4 is vrm
running stock
time for Ram... Ultra handled 3400 and Aorus 7 did 3633hz and x470 strix did 3600 ( 8 pack 4000hz) - again poor chip personally
Soldato
- Joined
- 18 May 2010
- Posts
- 23,967
- Location
- London
New Chipset drivers are out.
Soldato
- Joined
- 18 May 2010
- Posts
- 23,967
- Location
- London
I don't install the AMD Sata drivers on my system and just use the windows ones. Am I missing out?
Caporegime
- Joined
- 8 Jul 2003
- Posts
- 30,080
- Location
- In a house
Did anyone watched der8auer video of the 2990WX?
He mentioned that the 2990WX is composed of 4x 2900X.......
I think that's a error on his part, its made up of 4X 8 core chiplets, 2700X.
Depends. Would Nvidia fix their drivers to work properly with Ryzen?
Because here we are 18 months later and there still issues.
Also would those 8700K systems have all the BIOS security patches or left untouched not to lose performance but being prone to hacking?
However given the rumoured RTX2080 8% over the GTX1080Ti FE is just less than the GTX1080Ti Xtreme/Lightning (etc top of the range AIB ones).
So I can tell you that if you play AAA games that push the factory OC GTX1080Ti at 100% they will still hit 100% regardless the CPU and there won't be perf difference.
The issues are Ryzen side, the single core performance difference if you count in clock speeds & IPC is close to 30%, of course it's going to have an impact on gaming, a workload which has an affinity for single core speeds.
It's going to be interesting to see the articles on launch, no doubt the performance difference is going to open up since the previous delta limiting factor was GPU performance.
That being said, at 1440p the differences should still be pretty minimal @lnoton
You can see 1440p testing here with a 1080 Ti: https://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/AMD/Ryzen_Threadripper_2950X/14.html <5% between the 8700K and 2700X at 1440p.
It's going to be interesting to see the articles on launch, no doubt the performance difference is going to open up since the previous delta limiting factor was GPU performance.
That being said, at 1440p the differences should still be pretty minimal @lnoton
You can see 1440p testing here with a 1080 Ti: https://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/AMD/Ryzen_Threadripper_2950X/14.html <5% between the 8700K and 2700X at 1440p.
You don't need the AMD SATA drivers. The chipset drivers install everything you need.
Is it really shots because the i5 8400 has much better frametimes in the pre-streaming part of that marketing meme. Look at Rainbow 6 Siege for example, significantly better frametimes, guess that's why they had to do ">180 fps" instead of showing actual fps.
I really dislike marketing like that, just show the R5 being better at transcoding video or streaming without doing some >180 fud.
Edit: From what I see they weren't even using the same scenes for the two processors, I really dislike this kind of misleading marketing.
I really dislike marketing like that, just show the R5 being better at transcoding video or streaming without doing some >180 fud.
Edit: From what I see they weren't even using the same scenes for the two processors, I really dislike this kind of misleading marketing.
Last edited: